Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee - February 18, 2026 [Source] Translate

The Senate Judiciary Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee met to discuss House Bill 174, which seeks to make a moratorium on surgeries and hormonal treatments for minors permanent. Representative Shipp introduced the bill, referencing previous legislation, SB 16, which established the initial moratorium and required a study by the Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) on the evidence surrounding these treatments. Shipp expressed concerns about the potential harm of medical interventions for minors with mental health issues like gender dysphoria and criticized the DHHS study for lacking systematic evidence and reliability. Dr. David Becker, a pediatrician, supported the bill, highlighting negative outcomes associated with puberty blockers and a shift in public opinion against gender-affirming care for minors. He noted the closure of many gender clinics and increasing investigations into these practices. Dr. Kurt Maselli criticized the DHHS report for not being a systematic review and for omitting serious risks of hormonal treatments. Dr. Alan Smith raised ethical concerns about administering hormone treatments to minors, describing the DHHS report as biased. The meeting included discussions about the DHHS report's lack of objectivity and its reliance on pro-transgender terminology, contrasting it with other reviews that suggested the risks of hormone treatments may outweigh the benefits. Dr. Hoffman, who conducted the review, faced scrutiny for potential conflicts of interest due to his reliance on opinions from practitioners providing transgender care. Jeff Bennion, a licensed therapist, cautioned against oversimplifying suicide discussions and emphasized the need for addressing co-occurring mental health issues. Chloe Cole, a detransitioner, shared her negative experiences with medical transition, urging legislators to protect future generations. Concerns about conflicts of interest among committee members were raised, particularly regarding financial ties to the industry. Dr. Smith expressed frustration over the committee's recommendations, calling for a more representative group of physicians. Public comments revealed a divide in opinions, with more individuals opposing the bill than supporting it. Testimonies included personal stories advocating for both the protection of children from harmful practices and the importance of access to gender-affirming care. The committee discussed an amendment to delay the ban by one year for minors currently receiving treatment, which was ultimately passed with a vote of 5 to 2. The meeting also addressed a bill related to a shooting incident at the No Kings Rally, focusing on clarifying the application of the 14th Amendment and due process in self-defense cases. The bill aims to provide a clearer legal framework without altering existing Second Amendment rights. Public testimony included support for the bill from the Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, while concerns were raised about the absence of a justification hearing. The sponsor expressed willingness to refine the bill based on feedback. The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn, with the sponsor encouraged to bring the bill back for further discussion in a future meeting.