OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR
Fiscal Note
Fiscal Note On: HB 235 HLS 21RS 508
Bill Text Version: ENROLLED
Opp. Chamb. Action:
Proposed Amd.:
Sub. Bill For.:
Date: June 4, 2021 11:39 AM Author: CARTER, ROBBY
Dept./Agy.: Twenty-First Judicial District Court
Subject: Judgeships Analyst: Jamie Mergist
JUDGES/DISTRICT EN NO IMPACT LF EX See Note Page 1 of 1
Provides relative to certain judgeships in the Twenty-First Judicial District
Purpose of Bill: This bill codifies existing law (Act 3 of the 2007 Regular Session), which created the Division I judgeship in
the 21st Judicial District Court.
EXPENDITURES 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 5 -YEAR TOTAL
State Gen. Fd. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Agy. Self-Gen. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Ded./Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Federal Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Local Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
REVENUES 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 5 -YEAR TOTAL
State Gen. Fd. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Agy. Self-Gen. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Ded./Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Federal Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Local Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
EXPENDITURE EXPLANATION
There is no anticipated direct material effect on governmental expenditures as a result of this measure.
This bill only codifies the existing law that created the Division I judgeship in the 21st Judicial Court. An official with the
Court indicated that this bill will not create an additional judgeship nor will it impact Court expenditures. The Court currently
has 9 judges and will continue to have 9 judges.
REVENUE EXPLANATION
There is no anticipated direct material effect on governmental revenues as a result of this measure.
Senate Dual Referral Rules House
13.5.1 >= $100,000 Annual Fiscal Cost {S & H} 6.8(F)(1) >= $100,000 SGF Fiscal Cost {H & S}
Michael G. Battle
13.5.2 >= $500,000 Annual Tax or Fee 6.8(G) >= $500,000 Tax or Fee Increase
Change {S & H} or a Net Fee Decrease {S} Manager, Advisory Services