GREEN SHEET REDIGEST
HB 614 2020 Regular Session Seabaugh
INSURANCE: Provides relative to data security for persons regulated by the
commissioner of insurance
DIGEST
Proposed law enacts the Insurance Data Security Law to establish standards for data security
and for the investigation of and notification to the commissioner of a cybersecurity event
applicable to licensees of the Department of Insurance.
Proposed law defines "authorized individual", "consumer", "cybersecurity event",
"encrypted", "information security program", "information system", "licensee", "multi-factor
authentication", "nonpublic information", "person", "publicly available information", "risk
assessment", and "third-party service provider".
Proposed law requires a licensee to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive,
written information security program which satisfies the criteria required by proposed law
and does all of the following:
(1) Protect the security and confidentiality of nonpublic information and the security of
the information system.
(2) Protect against any threats or hazards to the security or integrity of nonpublic
information and the information system.
(3) Protect against unauthorized access to or use of nonpublic information and minimize
the likelihood of harm to any consumer.
(4) Define and periodically reevaluate a schedule for retention of nonpublic information
and a mechanism for its destruction when no longer needed.
Proposed law requires a licensee to conduct a risk assessment that meets the criteria specified
in proposed law, design an information security program to mitigate the identified risks, and
implement appropriate security measures.
Proposed law provides for the duties of the licensee's board of directors.
Proposed law provides for the duties of a licensee with regard to third-party service
providers.
Proposed law requires the licensee to monitor, evaluate, and adjust, as appropriate, the
information security program consistent with any relevant changes in technology, the
sensitivity of its nonpublic information, internal or external threats to information, and the
licensee's own changing business arrangements.
Proposed law requires each licensee to establish a written incident response plan designed
to promptly respond to, and recover from, any cybersecurity event that compromises the
confidentiality, integrity, or availability of nonpublic information in its possession, the
licensee's information systems, or the continuing functionality of any aspect of the licensee's
business or operations and establishes the minimum requirements of the response plan.
Proposed law requires a licensee which learns that a cybersecurity event has or may have
occurred, or an outside vendor or service provider designated to act on behalf of the licensee,
to conduct a prompt investigation and provides for the requirements of the investigation and
subsequent documentation.
Proposed law provides for the notification duties of a licensee once there is a determination
that a cybersecurity event has occurred.
Page 1 of 5
Prepared by Brandi Cannon.
Proposed law authorizes the commissioner to examine and investigate into the affairs of any
licensee to determine whether the licensee has been or is engaged in any violation of
proposed law and to take any action that is necessary or appropriate to enforce the provisions
of proposed law whenever the commissioner has reason to believe that a licensee has been
or is engaged in a violation of proposed law.
Proposed law provides for the confidentiality of any documents, materials, or other
information in the control or possession of the commissioner that are furnished by a licensee
or an employee or agent acting on behalf of a licensee pursuant to proposed law, including
an exemption to the Public Records Law and prohibits the commissioner from making such
information public.
Proposed law requiring a licensee to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive,
written information security program does not apply to a licensee who meets any of the
following criteria:
(1) Has fewer than 25 employees.
(2) Has less than $5 million in gross annual revenue.
(3) Has less than $10 million in year-end total assets.
(4) Establishes and maintains an information security program pursuant to the federal
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
(5) Is an employee, agent, representative, or designee of a licensee, who is also a
licensee, to the extent that the employee, agent, representative, or designee is covered
by the information security program of the other licensee.
(6) Is affiliated with a depository institution subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
(7) Is subject to another jurisdiction approved by the commissioner.
Proposed law authorizes the commissioner to do any of the following in the event of a
violation of proposed law:
(1) Suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew the certificate of authority or license of any
insurer, person, or entity.
(2) Levy a fine not to exceed $1,000 for each violation per insurer, person, or entity, up
to $100,000 aggregate for all violations in a calendar year per insurer, person, or
entity.
(3) Order any insurer, person, or entity to cease and desist any action that violates any
provision of proposed law.
Proposed law provides that the provisions of R.S. 22:2504(F) shall become effective on Aug.
1, 2022, the provisions of R.S. 22:250 shall become effective on Aug. 1, 2021, and Sections
1, 2, 3, and 4 shall become effective on Aug. 1, 2020.
(Amends R.S. 44:4.1(B)(11); adds R.S. 22:2501-2511)
Summary of Amendments Adopted by House
The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Insurance to the
original bill:
1. Remove provision of proposed law which states the purpose and intent of
proposed law and replace it with a provision which states that proposed law
establishes exclusive standards for La. which are applicable to licensees for
data security, the investigation of a cybersecurity event, and notification to
the commissioner.
Page 2 of 5
Prepared by Brandi Cannon.
2. Specify that references in definitions of "cybersecurity event" and
"information system" regarding information means nonpublic information.
3. Change a provision in the list of exclusions set forth in the definition of a
"licensee" from a licensee acting as an assuming insurer that is domiciled in
another state or jurisdiction to a person acting as such an assuming insurer.
4. Clarify that the definition of "nonpublic information" refers to electronic
information.
5. Remove a provision of proposed law that defines "nonpublic information" as
business-related information of a licensee that would cause an adverse impact
to the business, operations, or security of the licensee if the information were
to be tampered with or be disclosed, accessed, or used without authorization.
6. Clarify that the reference to an account number in the list of identifying
information contained in the definition of "nonpublic information" is a
financial account number.
7. Clarify that information or data created or derived from a healthcare provider
or consumer be information that identifies a particular consumer in order for
it to be identifying information for the purposes of defining "nonpublic
information."
8. Add that a licensee who learns about a cybersecurity event relative to a third-
party service provider's system make a reasonable effort to complete the steps
required by proposed law or make a reasonable effort to confirm and
document that the third-party service provider has completed such steps.
9. Change notice requirements from requiring that a licensee notify the
commissioner of a cybersecurity event as promptly as possible but no later
than seventy-two hours to requiring that a licensee furnish such notice
without unreasonable delay but no later than three business days, and change
subsequent notice requirement references of seventy-two hours to three
business days.
10. Clarify that the notice requirement refers to a cybersecurity event involving
nonpublic information in the possession of the licensee.
11. Add adjusters and public adjusters as defined in present law, R.S. 22:1661
and 1692, to the notification criterion regarding the licensee's domicile or
home state.
12. Add to the criterion regarding the licensee's domicile or home state that the
cybersecurity event has reasonable likelihood of materially harming either
any consumer residing in this state or any material part of the normal
operation of the licensee.
13. Clarify that subsequent notice requirements apply to material changes to
previously provided information relative to the cybersecurity event.
14. Clarify that the requirements regarding what information be provided to the
commissioner regarding the cybersecurity event be provided when making
notice as required by proposed law.
15. Add an exception to the requirement that licensees give notice of a
cybersecurity event when a system is maintained by a third-party service
provider when the third-party service provider has already given notice as
required by proposed law.
Page 3 of 5
Prepared by Brandi Cannon.
16. Add to the provision requiring notice when a cybersecurity event involves
information accessed by the consumer through an independent insurance
producer that such notice be required when it is required by the Database
Security Breach Notification Law.
17. Change the requirement for when a cybersecurity event involves information
accessed by the consumer through an independent insurance producer from
as soon as practicable as directed by the commissioner to no later than the
time at which notice is provided to the affected consumers.
18. Add to the provision requiring notice when a cybersecurity event involves
information accessed by the consumer through an independent insurance
producer that an insurer is excused from this obligation for any producers
who are not authorized by law or contract to sell, solicit, or negotiate on
behalf of the insurer.
19. Add to Public Records Law exception that the commissioner cannot
otherwise make the documents, materials, or other information public.
20. Add a provision that excludes documents, materials, or other information in
the control of the NAIC or a third-party from the Public Records Law.
21. Change the provision that a licensee is excluded from the information
security program if the licensee has fewer than ten employees to if the
licensee has fewer than twenty-five employees and remove the inclusion of
independent contractors.
22. Add to the list of criteria for the exclusion of a licensee from the information
security program that the licensee has less than five million dollars in gross
annual revenue and less than ten million dollars in year-end total assets.
23. Add to the list of criteria for the exclusion of a licensee from the information
security program if the licensee is subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
and meets the requirements of the act.
24. Add to the list of criteria for the exclusion of a licensee from the information
security program if the licensee is subject to present law and notify affected
consumers and the commissioner consistent with the requirements of the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
25. Add that a licensee who satisfies the provisions of proposed law may assert
a defense to any cause of action arising in tort and alleging the failure to
implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach
of nonpublic information.
26. Add that the provisions of R.S. 22:2504(F) shall become effective on Aug.
1, 2022, the provisions of R.S. 22:250 shall become effective on Aug. 1,
2021, and Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall become effective on Aug. 1, 2020.
Summary of Amendments Adopted by Senate
Committee Amendments Proposed by Senate Committee on Insurance to the
reengrossed bill
1. Provides that a licensee subject to HIPAA who establishes and maintains a
HIPAA-compliant information security program is required to submit a
written statement certifying compliance only if requested by the
commissioner in order to qualify as exempt from the proposed law
information security program requirements.
Page 4 of 5
Prepared by Brandi Cannon.
2. Provides that a licensee affiliated with a depository institution subject to the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act who establishes and maintains an information
security program compliant with the requirements of that Act is required to
submit a written statement certifying compliance only if requested by the
commissioner in order to qualify as exempt from the proposed law
information security program requirements.
3. Makes technical changes.
Page 5 of 5
Prepared by Brandi Cannon.

Statutes affected:
HB614 Original: 44:1(B)(11)
HB614 Engrossed: 44:1(B)(11)
HB614 Reengrossed: 44:1(B)(11)