HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: CS/HB 87 Taking of Bears
SPONSOR(S): Infrastructure Strategies Committee, Shoaf and others
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 632
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Agriculture, Conservation & Resiliency 12 Y, 4 N Gawin Moore
Subcommittee
2) Agriculture & Natural Resources Appropriations 11 Y, 3 N Byrd Pigott
Subcommittee
3) Infrastructure Strategies Committee 16 Y, 9 N, As CS Gawin Harrington
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
Article IV, section 9, of the Florida Constitution establishes the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) and grants FWC the regulatory and executive powers of the state concerning wild animal
life, freshwater aquatic life, and marine life.
The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) is the only bear that lives in Florida. The Florida black
bear historically roamed throughout the state, but now lives in several fragmented areas. Due to loss of habitat
and unregulated hunting, the population was reduced to an estimated 300-500 bears in the 1970s. As a result
of the population decline, FWC classified the Florida black bear as a threatened species in 1974. After more
than 35 years of strict statewide protection and management, FWC conducted an evaluation and determined
that the Florida black bear was no longer at high risk of extinction. As a result, the Florida black bear was
removed from the state threatened species list in 2012.
As the populations of both humans and bears have expanded in the state, there has been an increase in
human-bear conflicts, particularly in residential areas, where bears often search for food. Between 2009 and
2018, FWC euthanized an average of 38 bears annually due to public safety risks. FWC found that a majority
of the mortalities were associated with bears seeking out unsecured garbage or other human-provided food
sources. In 2022, FWC received 5,907 calls relating to bears, of which 36 percent were considered core
complaints. Bears in close proximity to humans create a range of issues from perceived threats (e.g., seeing a
bear on the edge of the forest) to potential threats to public safety (i.e., food conditioned and habituated bears).
The bill creates the “Self Defense Act,” (act) which specifies that a person who uses lethal force to take a bear
is not subject to any administrative, civil, or criminal penalties if:
 The person reasonably believed that his or her action was necessary to avoid an imminent threat of
death or serious bodily injury to himself or herself or another, an imminent threat of death or serious
bodily injury to a pet, or substantial damage to a dwelling;
 The person did not intentionally or recklessly place himself or herself or the pet in a situation in which
he or she would be likely to need to use lethal force; and
 The person notified FWC within 24 hours after using lethal force to take the bear.
The bill specifies that a person may not possess, sell, or dispose of the taken bear or its parts. A bear taken
under the act must be disposed of by FWC.
The bill does not have any fiscal impact on state government.
This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives .
STORAGE NAME: h0087e.ISC
DATE: 1/30/2024
 FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Background
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Article IV, section 9, of the Florida Constitution establishes the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) and grants FWC the regulatory and executive powers of the state concerning wild
animal life, freshwater aquatic life, and marine life.1
As a result of FWC’s constitutional authority, the Legislature is constitutionally prohibited from adopting
statutes in conflict with rules adopted by FWC to execute such authority.2 However, the Constitution
specifies that all licensing fees for taking wild animal life, freshwater aquatic life, and marine life as well
as the penalties for violating FWC regulations must be prescribed by the Legislature.3 In addition, the
Legislature must provide for FWC’s exercise of executive powers in the areas of planning, budgeting,
personnel management, and purchasing.4 The Legislature may also enact laws to aid FWC that are not
inconsistent with its constitutionally-conferred powers, except for special laws or general laws of local
application relating to hunting and fishing.5
Florida Black Bear
The Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) is the only bear that lives in Florida.6 The Florida
black bear historically roamed throughout the state, but now lives in several fragmented areas. 7 Due to
loss of habitat and unregulated hunting, the population was reduced to an estimated 300-500 bears in
the 1970s.8 As a result of the population decline, FWC classified the Florida black bear as a threatened
species in 1974.9 After more than 35 years of strict statewide protection and management, FWC
conducted an evaluation and determined that the Florida black bear was no longer at high risk of
extinction. As a result, the Florida black bear was removed from the state threatened species list in
2012.10
Population
Today, the Florida black bear population is comprised of seven distinct sub-populations within the state,
including Apalachicola, Eglin, Osceola, Ocala/St. Johns, Chassahowitzka, Highland/Glades, and Big
Cypress.11 During 2014 and 2015, FWC conducted a statewide population assessment for Florida black
bears and found that bear populations increased substantially in certain sub-populations and increased
by approximately 53 percent statewide.12 Although the Florida black bear population is growing and its
occupied range is expanding, the populations still only occur in seven relatively disconnected sub-
groups across the state.13
For management purposes, each sub-population is separated into a bear management unit (BMU). A
BMU is a geographic location bounded by county or state borders containing one of the seven Florida
1 Art. IV, s. 9, Fla. Const.
2 Art. IV, s. 9, Fla. Const.
3 Art. IV, s. 9, Fla. Const.
4 Id.
5 Id.
6 FWC, Florida Black Bear: FAQs, https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/liv ing/faqs/ (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
7 FWC, Black Bears Appearance, http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managed/bear/facts/appearance/ (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
8 FWC, Black Bear Research, http://myfwc.com/research/wildlife/terrestrial-mammals/bear/research/ (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
9 Id.
10 FWC, Bear Management Plan (2019), 25, available at https://myfwc.com/media/21923/ 2019-florida-black-bear-management-
plan.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
11 Id. at xix.
12 FWC, Florida Black Bear: Numbers, https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/numbers/ (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
13 FWC, Florida Black Bear: Black Bear Research, https://myfwc.com/research/wildlife/terrestrial-mammals/bear/research/ (last
visited Nov. 28, 2023).
STORAGE NAME: h0087e.ISC PAGE: 2
DATE: 1/30/2024
 black bear sub-populations.14 The goal of establishing BMUs is to provide a defined area within which
FWC can have a community-focused effort to effectively manage and conserve Florida black bears. 15
FWC manages each BMU to meet specific goals related to bear sub-population size, potential habitat,
human-bear conflicts, and potential threats, such as vehicle-related mortality.16
Habitat
Florida black bears range from the northeast to the southwest of the state.17 Updated ranges are
important for managing and predicting human-bear conflicts, determining potential areas to provide
linkage between sub-populations, employing conservation plans, implementing public outreach, and
monitoring listing criteria.18 Some of the sub-populations are small and are impacted by habitat
fragmentation, which restricts movement and genetic interchange among sub-populations.19
The Florida black bear is adaptable and inhabits a variety of forested habitats, but thrives in habitats
that provide an annual supply of seasonally available foods, secluded areas for denning, and some
degree of protection from humans.20 The optimal bear habitat in Florida is a thoroughly interspersed
14 FWC, Florida Black Bear: BMU, http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managed/bear/bmu/ (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
15 Id.
16 FWC, Bear Management Plan (2019), 28-29, available at https://myfwc.com/media/21923/2019-florida-black-bear-management-
plan.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
17 FWC, Florida Black Bear: Distribution Map, https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/liv ing/distribution -map/ (last visited
Nov. 28, 2023).
18 Id.
19 FWC, Bear Management Plan (2019), 45-46, available at https://myfwc.com/media/21923/2019-florida-black-bear-management-
plan.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
20 Id. at 8.
STORAGE NAME: h0087e.ISC PAGE: 3
DATE: 1/30/2024
 mixture of flatwoods, swamps, scrub oak ridges, bayheads, and hammock habitats. 21 Self-sustaining
and secure sub-populations of bears are typically found within large contiguous forested tracts that
contain understories of mast22 or berry-producing shrubs or trees.23
Human-bear Conflicts
As the populations of both humans and bears have expanded in the state, there has been an increase
in human-bear conflicts, particularly in residential areas, where bears often search for food. 24 Between
2009 and 2018, FWC euthanized an average of 38 bears annually due to public safety risks. 25 FWC
found that a majority of the mortalities were associated with bears seeking out unsecured garbage or
other human-provided food sources.26 In 2022, FWC received 5,907 calls relating to bears,27 of which
36 percent were considered core complaints.28
Bears in close proximity to humans create a range of issues from perceived threats (e.g., seeing a bear
on the edge of the forest) to potential threats to public safety (i.e., food conditioned and habituated
bears). FWC has attempted to capture and relocate bears; however, this practice was ineffective as
there are few remote places where relocated bears will not encounter humans and that are not already
occupied by other bears.29 Additionally, FWC found that 70 percent of relocated bears do not remain in
the area to which they are moved, and over half repeat conflict behavior even after they are moved. 30
As a result, FWC’s policies place an emphasis on the public’s personal responsibility for eliminating
attractants and thereby reducing or eliminating conflicts with bears. 31
In 2015, FWC adopted a statewide resolution highlighting the importance of securing attractants.32 That
same year, the Legislature increased the penalties for feeding wildlife, with enhanced penalties for
repeatedly feeding bears and certain other wildlife.33 Specifically, the law provided penalties for:
 Feeding wildlife with food or garbage;
 Attracting or enticing wildlife with food or garbage; or
 Allowing the placement of food or garbage in a manner that attracts or entices wildlife. 34
FWC also updated its bear feeding rule to allow law enforcement officers to issue notifications to people
who have been in contact with FWC regarding securing their garbage or other attractants and have
failed to do so.35 The notification serves as a formal reminder that the person’s actions could be in
violation of the law.36
21 Id.
22 The term “mast” is a general term for edible fruit when eaten by wildlife. Hard mast includes acorn, hickory, pecan, and othe r nuts
while soft mast includes fleshy berries such as palmetto berries, blueberries, and grapes. FWC, Bear Management Plan (2019), xvii,
available at https://myfwc.com/media/21923/ 2019-florida-black-bear-management-plan.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
23 Id. at 8.
24 Id. at 29.
25 FWC, Florida Black Bear Management Plan, 21 (2019), available at https://myfwc.com/media/21923/2019-draft-bear-
management-plan.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
26 Id.
27 FWC, Bears by the Numbers, https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/numbers/ (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
28 “Core complaint” refers to a subset of all the bear-related calls received by FWC that are classified as complaints. Core complaints
consist of the following categories: apiary, in building/tent/vehicle, in crops, in feed, in feeder, in garbage, in open gara ge, in screened
porch/patio, property damage, threatened/attacked/killed animal, and threatened/attacked/killed human. Categories of calls related to
human-bear interactions that are not classified as core complaints include: animal threatened/attacked/killed bear, dead bear, gene ral
question, harvest/hunt, human threatened bear, illegal activity, in area, in hog trap, in tree, in unscreened porch/patio, in yard,
misidentified, research, sick/injured bear, unintentionally approached human, and other. FWC, Florida Black Bear Management Plan,
xvi (2019), available at https://myfwc.com/media/21923/2019-draft-bear-management-plan.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
29 Id. at 55.
30 Id.
31 Id.
32 See FWC, Resolution, available at https://myfwc.com/media/7072/11b-b lackbearresolution.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
33 Chapter 2015-161, s. 12, Laws of Fla.
34 Section 379.412, F.S.
35 Chapter 68A-4.001, F.A.C.
36 Dr. Thomas Eason, Director, Division of Habitat and Species Conservation, FWC, Black Bear Program Update, slide 23 (April
2017), available at https://myfwc.com/media/18754/3b-bearp lanupdate.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
STORAGE NAME: h0087e.ISC PAGE: 4
DATE: 1/30/2024
 Taking of Bears
Through its constitutional authority to regulate wildlife, FWC has adopted rules to regulate the taking of
bears. Generally, under FWC rule, a person is prohibited from taking, possessing, injuring, shooting, or
selling a black bear or its parts or attempting to engage in such conduct. 37 However, such conduct is
authorized in certain limited circumstances when FWC issues a permit granting such authorization.
Pursuant to its rules, FWC may issue a permit authorizing the intentional take of a bear when it
determines such authorization furthers scientific or conservation purposes which will benefit the survival
potential of the species or reduce property damage caused by bears. 38 The rules specifically state that
activities that are eligible for a permit include the collection of scientific data needed for conservation or
management of the species as well as taking bears that are causing property damage when non-lethal
options cannot provide practical resolution to the damage, and FWC cannot capture the bear. 39
Members of the public may use non-lethal means to scare away bears that may be in a person’s yard
or rifling through trash. Black bears are not considered nuisance animals that can be taken by a
property owner.40
Hunting as a Management Tool
Bear hunting in Florida was first regulated in 1936 and continued through 1994 in certain parts of the
state. The most recent bear hunt occurred in October 2015, during which FWC authorized four of the
seven BMUs to be opened to bear hunting.41 Each BMU had an established harvest objective, which
was based on taking 20 percent of the estimated BMU population and subtracting the annual known
mortality.42 The table below depicts the harvest objectives and the actual harvest numbers.43
The hunt was authorized to begin October 24, 2015, and FWC had the ability to close the season using
a daily cut-off mechanism both within each BMU and statewide.44 The hunt was spread across 26
counties, and 78 percent of bears were taken on private lands.45 The East Panhandle and Central
BMUs were closed beginning October 25, 2015, while the North and South BMUs were closed
beginning October 26, 2015.46
According to FWC, hunting is used as a tool to meet wildlife population objectives, such as slowing
population growth rates, rather than to resolve human-bear conflicts, which are better managed by
securing items in neighborhoods that attract bears.47
37 Rule 68A-4.009(1), F.A.C.
38 Rule 68A-4.009(2), F.A.C.
39 Rule 68A-4.009(2)(a)-(b), F.A.C.
40 Rule 68A-9.010(1)(b)1., F.A.C.
41 FWC, 2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report, 1, available at https://myfwc.com/media/13669/ 2015-florida-black-bear-
hunt-report.pdf (last visited Nov. 28, 2023).
42 Id. at 2.
43 Id. at 3.
44 Id.
45 Id.
46 Id.
47 FWC, Florida Black Bear General Hunting FAQs, https://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/wildlife/bear/plan-faqs/hunting-faqs/ (last
visited Nov. 28, 2023).
STORAGE NAME: h0087e.ISC PAGE: 5
DATE: 1/30/2024
 Effect of the Bill
The bill creates the “Self Defense Act,” (act) which specifies that a person who uses lethal force to take
a bear is not subject to any administrative, civil, or criminal penalties if:
 The person reasonably believed that his or her action was necessary to avoid an imminent
threat o