HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: CS/CS/HB 313 Pub. Rec./Military Personnel and their Families
SPONSOR(S): State Affairs Committee, Ethics, Elections & Open Government Subcommittee, Rudman,
Holcomb and others
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 560
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special 14 Y, 0 N Shapiro Darden
Districts Subcommittee
2) Ethics, Elections & Open Government 18 Y, 0 N, As CS Shapiro Toliver
Subcommittee
3) State Affairs Committee 20 Y, 0 N, As CS Shapiro Williamson
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
Current law provides several public record exemptions for certain identification and location information of
specified current or former agency employees and their spouses and children. However, it does not provide a
public record exemption for certain United States military personnel.
The bill creates a public record exemption for the following identification and location information of current or
former military personnel and their spouses and dependents:
 Home addresses, telephone numbers, and dates of birth of current or former military personnel, and the
telephone numbers associated with the personal communication devices of such personnel;
 Home addresses, telephone numbers, and dates of birth of the spouses and dependents of current or
former military personnel, and the telephone numbers associated with the personal communication
devices of such spouses and dependents; and
 Names and locations of schools attended by the spouses of current or former military personnel, and
schools and day care facilities attended by dependents of such personnel.
The bill defines “military personnel” to mean persons employed by the U.S. Department of Defense who have
been authorized to access information deemed “secret” or “top secret” by the Federal Government, as well as
current or former servicemembers of a special operations force.
In order for the exemption to apply, the military personnel member must submit to the custodial agency a
written request that his or her information be exempt and a written statement that reasonable efforts have been
made by the military personnel member to protect the identification and location information from being
accessible through other means available to the public.
The bill provides that the public record exemption is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act and
will stand repealed on October 2, 2028, unless reviewed and saved from repeal by the Legislature. It also
provides a statement of public necessity as required by the Florida Constitution.
The bill may have a negative, but likely insignificant, fiscal impact on state and local governments.
Article I, s. 24(c) of the Florida Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the members present and
voting for final passage of a newly created or expanded public record or public meeting exemption.
The bill creates a public record exemption; thus, it requires a two-thirds vote for final passage.
This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives .
STORAGE NAME: h0313e.SAC
DATE: 4/20/2023
 FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Present Situation
Public Records
Article I, s. 24(a) of the Florida Constitution sets forth the state’s public policy regarding access to
government records. This section guarantees every person a right to inspect or copy any public record
of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government.1 The Legislature, however, may
provide by general law for exemption from public record requirements provided the exemption passes
by two-thirds vote of each chamber, states with specificity the public necessity justifying the exemption,
and is no broader than necessary to meet its public purpose.2
Public policy regarding access to government records is also addressed by statute. Section 119.07(1),
F.S., guarantees every person a right to inspect and copy any state, county, or municipal record, unless
the record is exempt.3 Furthermore, the Open Government Sunset Review Act4 provides that a public
record exemption may be created or maintained only if it serves an identifiable public purpose that is
sufficiently compelling to override the strong public policy of open government and cannot be
accomplished without the exemption.5 An identifiable public purpose is served if the exemption meets
one of the following purposes:
 Allow the state or its political subdivisions to effectively and efficiently administer a
governmental program, which administration would be significantly impaired without the
exemption;
 Protect sensitive personal information that, if released, would be defamatory or would
jeopardize an individual’s safety; however, only the identity of an individual may be exempted
under this provision; or
 Protect trade or business secrets.6
Pursuant to the Open Government Sunset Review Act, a new public record exemption or substantial
amendment of an existing public record exemption is repealed on October 2nd of the fifth year following
enactment, unless the Legislature reenacts the exemption.
Current Public Record Exemptions for Identification and Location Information
Current law provides several public record exemptions for certain identification and location information
of specified current or former agency employees and their spouses and children. 7 Information and
location information typically includes the home addresses, 8 telephone numbers,9 dates of birth, and
photographs of specified agency employees and their spouses and children. Additionally, the places of
employment of the spouses and children of the specified agency employees as well as the names and
locations of schools and day care facilities attended by those children are exempt from public record
requirements.
1
Art. I, s. 24(a), FLA. CONST.
2 Art. I, s. 24(c), FLA. CONST.
3 A public record exemption means a provision of general law which provides that a specified record, or portion thereof, is not subject to
the access requirements of s. 119.07(1), F.S., or s. 24, Art. I of the State Constitution. See s. 119.011(8), F.S.
4 S. 119.15, F.S.
5 S. 119.15(6)(b), F.S.
6 Id.
7 See s. 119.071(4)(d), F.S.
8 The term “home addresses” means the dwelling location at which an individual resides and includes the physical address, maili ng
address, street address, parcel identification number, plot identification number, legal property description, neighborhood name and lot
number, GPS coordinates, and any other descriptive property information that may reveal the home address. S. 119.071(4)(d)1.a ., F.S.
9 The term “telephone numbers” includes home telephone numbers, personal cellular telephone numbers, personal pager telephone
numbers, and telephone numbers associated with personal communications devices. S. 119.071(4)(d)1.b., F.S.
STORAGE NAME: h0313e.SAC PAGE: 2
DATE: 4/20/2023
 Current law also provides a public record exemption for certain identification and location information of
United States attorneys and assistant U.S. attorneys, U.S. Courts of Appeal judges, U.S. District Court
judges, and U.S. Magistrates, as well as their spouses and children. 10 In order for the exemption to
apply, the attorney, judge, or magistrate must submit to the custodial agency a written request to
exempt the information from public record requirements.11 In addition, the
attorney, judge, or magistrate must submit a written statement that he or she has made reasonable
efforts to protect such information from being accessible through other means available to the public .12
A similar public record exemption for the identification and location information of current or former
members of the U.S. Armed Forces, their reserve components, and the National Guard, who served
after September 11, 2001, as well as their spouses and children used to exist. However, that exemption
sunset on October 2, 2020.13
Effect of Proposed Changes
The bill creates a public record exemption for the identification and location information of current and
former military personnel and their spouses and dependents. The bill defines “military personnel” to
mean persons employed by the U.S. Department of Defense who have been authorized to access
information deemed “secret” or “top secret” by the Federal Government, as well as current or former
servicemembers of a special operations force.14
Specifically, the public record exemption provides that the following identification and location
information is exempt15 from public record requirements:
 Home addresses, telephone numbers, and dates of birth of current and former military
personnel, and the telephone numbers associated with the personal communication devices of
such personnel;
 Home addresses, telephone numbers, and dates of birth of the spouses and dependents of
current and former military personnel, and the telephone numbers associated with the personal
communication devices of such spouses and dependents; and
 Names and locations of schools attended by the spouses of current and former military
personnel, and schools and day care facilities attended by dependents of such personnel.
In order for the exemption to apply, the military personnel member must submit to the custodial agency
a written request to exempt the information from public record requirements and a written statement
that he or she has made reasonable efforts to protect the identification and location information from
being accessible through other means available to the public.
The bill provides the constitutionally required public necessity statement. 16 Pursuant to the Open
Government Sunset Review Act, the bill provides that the exemption will repeal on October 2, 2028,
unless reenacted by the Legislature.
10
S. 119.071(5)(i), F.S.
11
S. 119.071(5)(i)2.a., F.S.
12 S. 119.071(5)(i)2.b., F.S.
13 Formerly s. 119.071(5)(k), F.S.
14 The bill defines “special operations force” to mean those active and reserve component forces of the military services designated by
the Secretary of Defense and specifically organized, trained, and equipped to conduct and support special operations. The ter m
includes, but is not limited to, servicemembers of the U.S. Army Special Forces and the U.S. Army 75th Ranger Regiment; the U.S.
Navy SEALs and Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen; the U.S. Air Force Combat Control, Pararescue, and Tactical Air Control
Party specialists; the U.S. Marine Corps Critical Skills Operators; and any other component of the U.S. Special Operations Command
approved by the commission.
15 There is a difference between records the Legislature designates exempt from public record requirements and those the Legislature
deems confidential and exempt. A record classified as exempt from public disclosure may be disclosed under certain circumstances.
See WFTV, Inc. v. The School Board of Seminole, 874 So.2d 48, 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), review denied 892 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 2004);
City of Riviera Beach v. Barfield, 642 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Williams v. City of Minneola, 575 So.2d 687 (Fla. 5th DCA
1991). If the Legislature designates a record as confidential and exempt from public disclosure, such record may not be relea sed, by
the custodian of public records, to anyone other than the persons or entities specifically designated in statute. See Attorney General
Opinion 85-62, Aug. 1, 1985.
16 Art. I. s. 24(c), FLA. C ONST., requires each public record exemption to “state with specificity the public necessity justifying the
exemption.”
STORAGE NAME: h0313e.SAC PAGE: 3
DATE: 4/20/2023
 B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1: Amends s. 119.071, F.S., relating to general exemptions from inspecting or copying of
records.
Section 2: Provides a public necessity statement.
Section 3: Provides an effective date of upon becoming a law.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
See Fiscal Comments.
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
See Fiscal Comments.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
None.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
The bill could create a negative, but likely insignificant, fiscal impact on state and local agencies as staff
for those entities could require training related to the public record exemption. It is unclear whether the
staff will experience an increase in workload due to the number of military personnel who may take
advantage of the public record exemption. The costs should be absorbed as they are part of the day-to-
day responsibilities of the agency.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not applicable. The bill does not require counties or municipalities to take an action requiring the
expenditure of funds, reduce the authority that counties or municipalities have to raise revenue in the
aggregate, nor reduce the percentage of state tax shared with counties or municipalities.
2. Other:
Vote Requirement
Article I, s. 24(c) of the Florida Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the members present and
voting for final passage of a newly created or expanded public record or public meeting exemption.
The bill creates a public record exemption; thus, it requires a two-thirds vote for final passage.
STORAGE NAME: h0313e.SAC PAGE: 4
DATE: 4/20/2023
 Public Necessity Statement
Article I, s. 24(c) of the Florida Constitution requires a public necessity statement for a newly created
or expanded public record or public meeting exemption. The bill creates a public record exemption;
thus, it includes a public necessity statement. The public necessity statement provides, in part, that
as terrorist groups have threatened military personnel and their families and have encouraged
terrorist sympathizers to harm military personnel and their families within the United States, the
Legislature finds that allowing continued public access to the identification and location information of
current or former military personnel and their families jeopardizes the safety of these military
personnel, their spouses, and their dependents.
Breadth of Exemption
Article I, s. 24(c) of the Florida Constitution requires a newly created or expanded public record or
public meeting exemption to be no broader than necessary to accomplish the stated purpose of the
law. The bill creates a public record exemption for the identification and location information of
current or former military personnel, as well as the spouses and dependents of such persons. The
exemption is limited to those military personnel who serve or served in a special operations force, or
who are or were employed by the U.S. Department of Defense and authorized to access information
deemed “secret” or “top secret” by the Federal Government, to prevent potential harm to those
persons and their families by terrorists or terrorist sympathizers. As such, it does not appear to be in
conflict with the constitutional requirement that it be no broader than necessary to accomplish its
purpose.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
The bill neither provides authority for nor requires rulemaking by executive branch agencies.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
None.
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
On March 29, 2023, the Ethics, Elections & Open Government Subcommittee adopted a strike-all amendment
and reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The amendment narrowed the scope of the
exemption to only encompass current and former servicemembers of a special operations force and their
families. Additionally, the amendment removed a provision protecting the place of employment of a spouse or
dependent of a current or former servicemember of a special operations force from disclosure.
On April 19, 2023, the State Affairs Committee adopted a strike-all amendment and reported the bill favorably
as a committee substitute. The amendment expanded the scope of the exemption to encompass current and
former persons employed by the U.S. Department of Defense who have been authorized to access information
deemed “secret” or “top secret” by the Federal Government, and their families.
This analysis is drafted to the committee substituted as approved by the State Affairs Committee.
STORAGE NAME: h0313e.SAC PAGE: 5
DATE: 4/20/2023