Bill Summary – FastDemocracy

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE
REGULAR SESSION
                 Introduced House Bill 4316
  BY DELEGATES FOSTER, SYPOLT, GRAVES, SUMMERS,
  MCGEEHAN, J. JEFFRIES, PHILLIPS, STORCH, STEELE,
                ROWAN, AND BROWN
    [Introduced January 21, 2022; Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary]
     Intr HB                                                                                    2022R1922
  A BILL amend and reenact §48-1-239 and §48-1-241a of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as
            amended; and to amend and reenact §48-9-102, §48-9-203, and §48-9-205 of said code,
            all relating to “Best Interests of the Child Protection Act of 2022”; establishing the
            presumption that co-equal shared legal and physical custody of children in cases of
            divorce to be in the best interests of the children and families; requiring that temporary
            parenting plans and permanent parenting plans consider the presumption of co-equal
            shared legal and physical custody is in the best interests of a child; all relating generally
            to the public policy recognition and preservation of the fundamental constitutional rights of
            all parents to raise their own children and that it is presumptively in the best interest of
           children to be raised by both of their parents equally.
     Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
                             CHAPTER 48. DOMESTIC RELATIONS.
     ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS; DEFINITIONS.
 §48-1-239. Shared parenting defined.
           (a) “Shared parenting” means either basic shared parenting or extended shared parenting.
           (b) “Basic shared parenting” means an arrangement under which one parent keeps a child
 or children overnight for less than 35 percent of the year and under which both parents contribute
 to the expenses of the child or children in addition to the payment of child support.
           (c) “Extended shared parenting” means an arrangement under which each parent keeps
 a child or children overnight for more than 35 percent of the year, with a presumption in favor of
 co-equal joint custody and equally divided parenting time, and under which both parents
 contribute to the expenses of the child or children in addition to the payment of child support:
 Provided, That physical custody shall be shared by the parents in such a way as to assure a child
 frequent and continued contact with both parents.
           (b) It is the public policy of the state of West Virginia to recognize the presumption,
                                                        1
     Intr HB                                                                                         2022R1922
 overwhelmingly supported by social science research, that co-equal joint custody and equally
 divided parenting time is in the best interest of children.
           (d) (c) In any case where, in the absence of an agreement between the parents, a court
 does not orders shared parenting; the order shall be in writing and include specific findings of fact
 supporting the Court’s determination.
     §48-1-241a. Shared physical custody defined.
            “Shared physical custody” means a child has periods of residing with, and being under the
  supervision of, each parent consistent with the provisions of §48-9-206 of this code: Provided,
  That physical custody shall be shared by the parents in such a way as to assure a child has
  frequent and continuing contact with both parents. Such frequent and continuing contact with both
  parents is rebuttably presumed to be in the best interests of the child unless the evidence shows
  otherwise. For the purposes of this section, and any other provision within Chapter 48 of the Code
  of West Virginia, the terms “frequent and continuing contact with both parents” shall be presumed
  to mean co-equal joint physical and legal custody and further presumed to be in the best interest
  of the child or children, such presumption being rebuttable as set forth in §§48-9-203 and 48-9-
 205 of this code.
     §48-9-102. Objectives; best interests of the child.
            (a) The primary objective of this article is to serve the child’s best interests, by facilitating:
            (1) Stability of the child;
            (2) Parental planning and agreement about the child’s custodial arrangements and
  upbringing;
            (3) Continuity of existing parent-child attachments;
            (4) Meaningful contact between a child and each parent, with a presumption in favor of
  co-equal joint custody and equally divided parenting time;
            (5) Caretaking and parenting relationships by adults who love the child, know how to
  provide for the child’s needs, and who place a high priority on doing so;
                                                           2
     Intr HB                                                                                      2022R1922
           (6) Security from exposure to physical or emotional harm;
           (7) Expeditious, predictable decision-making and avoidance of prolonged uncertainty
 respecting arrangements for the child’s care and control; and
           (8) Meaningful contact between a child and his or her siblings, including half-siblings.
           (b) A secondary objective of article is to achieve fairness between the parents.
           (c) It is the public policy of the state of West Virginia to recognize the presumption,
 overwhelmingly supported by social science research, that co-equal joint custody and equally
 divided parenting time is in the best interest of children.
     §48-9-203. Proposed temporary parenting plan; temporary order; amendment; vacation of
               order.
            (a) A parent seeking a temporary order relating to parenting shall file and serve a proposed
  temporary parenting plan by motion. The other parent, if contesting the proposed temporary
  parenting plan, shall file and serve a responsive proposed parenting plan. Either parent may move
  to have a proposed temporary parenting plan entered as part of a temporary order. The parents
  may enter an agreed temporary parenting plan at any time as part of a temporary order. The
  proposed temporary parenting plan may be supported by relevant evidence and shall be verified
  and shall state at a minimum the following:
            (1) The name, address and length of residence with the person or persons with whom the
  child has lived for the preceding twelve months;
           (2) The performance by each parent during the last 12 months of the parenting functions
 relating to the daily needs of the child;
           (3) The parents’ work and child-care schedules for the preceding twelve months;
           (4) The parents’ current work and child-care schedules; and
           (5) Any of the circumstances set forth in §48-9-209 of this code that are likely to pose a
 serious risk to the child and that warrant limitation on the award to a parent of temporary residence
 or time with the child pending entry of a permanent parenting plan.
                                                        3
     Intr HB                                                                                      2022R1922
           (b) At the hearing, the court shall enter a temporary parenting order incorporating a
 temporary parenting plan which includes:
           (1) A schedule for the child’s time with each parent: when appropriate Provided, That with
 regard to establishing temporary child custody and parenting time, there is a rebuttable
 presumption that co-equal joint custody is in the best interest of the child or children.
           (A) The presumption that co-equal joint custody is in the best interest of the child or
 children may be rebutted:
           (i) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that co-equal joint custody is not in
 the best interest of the child or children;
           (ii) If the parties have consensually reached an agreement on all issues related to the
 physical and legal custody of the child and parenting time allocation;
           (iii) If one of the parties does not request sole, primary, or joint custody; or
           (iv) If one of the parties has committed an act of domestic violence against the party
 making the allegation or a family or household member of either party and such allegations are
 or have been proven in an adversarial evidentiary hearing on the record by a preponderance of
 the evidence;
           (v) If one of the parties is a convicted sex offender who is required to register under any
 state or federal sex offender statute;
           (vi) The establishment of any of the limiting factors set forth in §48-9-209 of the Code of
 West Virginia proven in an adversarial evidentiary hearing on the record by a preponderance of
 the evidence.
           (2) Designation of a temporary residence for the child;
           (3) Allocation of decision-making authority, if any. Absent allocation of decision-making
 authority consistent with §48-9-207 of this code, neither party shall make any decision for the child
 other than those relating to day-to-day or emergency care of the child, which shall be made by
 the party who is present with the child;
                                                          4
     Intr HB                                                                                    2022R1922
           (4) Provisions for temporary support for the child;
           (5) Restraining orders, if applicable; and
           (6) Specific findings of fact upon which the court bases its determinations.
           (c) A parent may make a motion for an order to show cause and the court may enter a
 temporary order, including a temporary parenting plan, upon a showing of necessity.
           (d) A parent may move for amendment of a temporary parenting plan, and the court may
 order amendment to the temporary parenting plan, if the amendment conforms to the limitations
 of §48-9-209 of this code and is in the best interest of the child. The court’s order modifying the
 plan shall be in writing and contain specific findings of fact upon which the court bases its
 determinations.
           (e) So long as the parties have not consensually agreed otherwise, nor that any of the
 issues set forth in §§48-9-203(b)(1)(A)(iv), 48-9-203(b)(1)(A)(v), or 48-9-203(b)(1)(A)(vi) of this
 code have been established, the court shall to the maximum extent possible establish a temporary
 parenting plan granting the parent with less than co-equal joint custody the maximum amount of
 parenting time possible, including, but not limited to, the child or children residing with the less
 than co-equal joint custody parent and any siblings/half-siblings during school summer vacation
 months and on other extended holidays and scheduled vacations.
           (f) Modifications of temporary parenting plans under §§48-9-401, 48-9-402, or 48-9-403
 of this code, shall all be subject to the presumptions and goals set forth in this §48-9-203 of this
 code.
     §48-9-205. Permanent parenting plan.
            (a) A party seeking a judicial allocation of custodial responsibility or decision-making
  responsibility under this article shall file a proposed parenting plan with the court. Parties may file
  a joint plan. A proposed plan shall be verified and shall state, to the extent known or reasonably
  discoverable by the filing party or parties:
            (1) The name, address, and length of residence of any adults with whom the child has
                                                        5
     Intr HB                                                                                   2022R1922
  lived for one year or more, or in the case of a child less than one year of age, any adults with
  whom the child has lived since the child’s birth;
            (2) The name and address of each of the child’s parents and any other individuals with
  standing to participate in the action under §48-9-103 of this code;
           (3) A description of the allocation of caretaking and other parenting responsibilities
 performed by each person named in §48-9-205(a)(1) and §48-9-205(a)(2) of this code; (4) A
 description of the work and child-care schedules of any person seeking an allocation of custodial
 responsibility and any expected changes to these schedules in the near future;
           (5) A description of the child’s school and extracurricular activities;
           (6) A description of any of the limiting factors as described in §48-9-209 of this code that
 are present, including any restraining orders against either parent to prevent domestic or family
 violence, by case number and jurisdiction;
           (7) Required financial information; and
           (8) A description of the known areas of agreement and disagreement with any other
 parenting plan submitted in the case.
           The court shall maintain the confidentiality of any information required to be filed under
 this section when the person giving that information has a reasonable fear of domestic abuse,
 and disclosure of the information would increase that fear.
           (b) The court shall develop a process to identify cases in which there is credible
 information that child abuse or neglect as defined in §49-1-201 of this code or domestic violence
 as defined in §48-27-202 of this code has occurred. The process shall include assistance for
 possible victims of domestic abuse in complying with §48-9-205(a)(6) of this code and referral to
 appropriate resources for safe shelter, counseling, safety planning, information regarding the
 potential impact of domestic abuse on children, and information regarding civil and criminal
 remedies for domestic abuse. The process shall also include a system for ensuring that jointly
 submitted parenting plans that are filed in cases in which there is credible information that child
                                                          6
     Intr HB                                                                                       2022R1922
 abuse or domestic abuse has occurred receive the court review that is mandated by §48-9-202(b)
 of this code.
           (c) Upon motion of a party and after consideration of the evidence, the court shall order a
 parenting plan consistent with the provisions of §48-9-206 through §48-9-209 of this code,
 containing:
           (1) A provision for the child’s living arrangements and each parent’s custodial
 responsibility, which shall include either:
           (A) A custodial schedule that designates in which parent’s home each minor child will
 reside on given days of the year; or
           (B) A formula or method for determining a schedule in sufficient detail that, if necessary,
 the schedule can be enforced in subsequent proceedings by the court: Provided, That with regard
 to establishing permanent child custody and parenting time, there is a rebuttable presumption that
 co-equal joint custody is in the best interest of the child or children.
           (i) The presumption that co-equal joint custody is in the best interest of the child or children
 may be rebutted:
           (I) If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that co-equal joint custody is not in
 the best interest of the child or children;
           (II) If the parties have consensually reached an agreement on all issues related to the
 physical and legal custody of the child and parenting time allocation;
           (III) If one of the parties does not request sole, primary, or joint custody; or
           (IV) If one of the parties has committed an act of domestic violence against the party
 making the allegation or a family or household member of either party and such allegations are
 or have been proven in an adversarial evidentiary hearing on the record by a preponderance of
 the evidence;
           (V) If one of the parties is a convicted sex offender who is required to register under any
 state or federal sex offender statute;
                                                          7
     Intr HB                                                                                                2022R1922
           (VI) The establishment of any of the limiting factors set forth in §48-9-209 of the Code of
 West Virginia proven in an adversarial evidentiary hearing on the record by a preponderance of
 the evidence.
           (2) An allocation of decision-making responsibility as to significant matters reasonably
 likely to arise with respect to the child;
           (3) A provision consistent with §48-9-202 of this code for resolution of disputes that arise
 under the plan and remedies for violations of the plan; and
           (4) A plan for the custody of the child should one or both of the parents as a member of
 the National Guard, a reserve component, or an active duty component be mobilized, deployed,
 or called to active duty.
           (d) A parenting plan may, at the court’s discretion, contain provisions that address matters
 that are expected to arise in the event of a party’s relocation, or provide for future modifications
 in the parenting plan if specified contingencies occur.
           (e) So long as the parties have not consensually agreed otherwise, nor that any of the
 issues set forth in §§48-9-205(c)(1)(C)(i)(IV), 48-9-205(c)(1)(C)(i)(V), or 48-9-205(c)(1)(C)(i)(VI)
 of this code have been established, the court shall to the maximum extent possible establish a
 permanent parenting plan granting the parent with less than co-equal joint custody the maximum
 amount of parenting time possible, including, but not limited to, the child or children residing with
76