Assembly Bill 447 proposes an amendment to Wisconsin Statute 885.60 (2) (d) regarding the use of videoconferencing technology in certain civil actions. Currently, defendants in criminal cases and respondents in specific civil actions have the right to be physically present in the courtroom during their proceedings. If they object to the use of videoconferencing for proceedings they are entitled to attend in person, the court must uphold that objection. However, for other proceedings, the court has discretion in handling such objections.

The bill introduces a new exception that allows the court to exercise discretion regarding objections made by respondents concerning the testimony of an expert witness via videoconference technology in cases related to admissions, placements, or commitments, including involuntary commitment and protective placement proceedings. This means that even if a respondent has the right to be present in person, the court can decide whether to allow the expert's testimony to be presented through videoconferencing. The specific legal language amended includes the deletion of the phrase "If" at the beginning of the relevant section and the insertion of new language clarifying the exception for expert witness testimony in matters under chapters 51 or 55.

Statutes affected:
Bill Text: 885.60(2)(d), 885.60