[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1095 Reported in Senate (RS)]
<DOC>
Calendar No. 45
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1095
To enable the Federal Trade Commission to deter filing of sham citizen
petitions to cover an attempt to interfere with approval of a competing
generic drug or biosimilar, to foster competition, and facilitate the
efficient review of petitions filed in good faith to raise legitimate
public health concerns, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 24, 2025
Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Blumenthal,
Mr. Cruz, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
April 10, 2025
Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To enable the Federal Trade Commission to deter filing of sham citizen
petitions to cover an attempt to interfere with approval of a competing
generic drug or biosimilar, to foster competition, and facilitate the
efficient review of petitions filed in good faith to raise legitimate
public health concerns, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Significant and Time-wasting
Abuse Limiting Legitimate Innovation of New Generics Act'' or the
``Stop STALLING Act''.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ENFORCEMENT AGAINST SHAM PETITIONS.
(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal
Trade Commission.
(2) Covered application.--The term ``covered application''
means an application filed pursuant to subsection (b)(2) or (j)
of section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 355) or section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act
(42 U.S.C. 262(k)).
(3) Covered petition.--The term ``covered petition'' means
a petition, or a supplement to a petition, filed under section
505(q) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
355(q)).
(4) Person.--The term ``person''--
(A) means an individual or entity; and
(B) includes--
(i) a successor or an assign of an entity;
(ii) a joint venture, subsidiary,
partnership, division, group, or affiliate
controlled by an entity; and
(iii) a successor or an assign of a joint
venture, subsidiary, partnership, division,
group, or affiliate controlled by an entity.
(5) Series of covered petitions.--The term ``series of
covered petitions'' means any group of more than 1 covered
petition relating to the same covered application.
(6) Sham.--The term ``sham'' means--
(A) a covered petition that--
(i) is objectively baseless; and
(ii) attempts to use a governmental
process, as opposed to the outcome of that
process, to interfere with the business of a
competitor; or
(B) a series of covered petitions that attempts to
use a governmental process, as opposed to the outcome
of that process, to interfere with the business of a
competitor.
(b) Violation.--A person submitting or causing the submission of a
covered petition or a series of covered petitions that is a sham shall
be liable for engaging in an unfair method of competition under section
5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)).
(c) Civil Action.--
(1) In general.--If the Commission has reason to believe
that the submission of a covered petition or a series of
covered petitions constitutes a violation of section 5(a)(1) of
the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)), the
Commission may commence a civil action to recover a civil
penalty and seek other appropriate relief in a district court
of the United States against any person that submitted or
caused to be submitted such covered petition or such series of
covered petitions.
(2) Presumption.--In a civil action under paragraph (1), a
covered petition shall be presumed to be part of a series of
covered petitions that is a sham under subsection (b) of this
section if--
(A) the Secretary of Health and Human Services--
(i) has determined that the covered
petition was submitted with the primary purpose
of delaying the approval of a covered
application; and
(ii) has referred such determination to the
Commission in writing, including a reasoned
basis for the determination; and
(B) the covered petition was part of a series of
covered petitions.
(3) Exception.--The presumption in paragraph (2) shall not
apply if the defendant establishes, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the series of covered petitions that includes
the covered petition referred to the Commission by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a sham.
(4) Civil penalty.--In an action under paragraph (1), any
person that has been found liable for a violation of section
5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C.
45(a)(1)) shall be subject to a civil penalty for each
violation of not more than the greater of--
(A) any revenue earned from the sale by such person
of any drug product, referenced in a covered
application that was the subject of a covered petition
or a series of covered petitions that is a sham, during
the period during which the covered petition or series
of covered petitions was under review by the Secretary
of Health and Human Services; or
(B) $50,000 for each calendar day that each covered
petition that is a sham or that was part of a series of
covered petitions that is a sham was under review by
the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(5) Review of referral.--No referral by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services under paragraph (2)(A) shall be
subject to judicial review, except as a third-party claim
asserted by the defendant under section 706(2)(A) of title 5,
United States Code, against the Secretary of Health and Human
Services or the Department of Health and Human Services, as
part of a civil action commenced under paragraph (1).
(6) Antitrust laws.--Nothing in this section shall modify,
impair, limit, or supersede the applicability of the antitrust
laws, as defined in subsection (a) of the first section of the
Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12), and of section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent that it
applies to unfair methods of competition.
(7) Rule of construction.--The civil penalty provided in
this subsection is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any
other remedies provided by Federal law, including under section
16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 26) or under section 13(b) of
the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 53(b)).
(d) Applicability.--This section shall apply to any covered
petition submitted on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
(e) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed
to limit any authority of the Commission under any other provision of
law.
SEC. 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision
to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the
remainder of this Act and the application of the provisions of such Act
to any person or circumstance shall not be affected.
Calendar No. 45
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1095
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To enable the Federal Trade Commission to deter filing of sham citizen
petitions to cover an attempt to interfere with approval of a competing
generic drug or biosimilar, to foster competition, and facilitate the
efficient review of petitions filed in good faith to raise legitimate
public health concerns, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
April 10, 2025
Reported without amendment