South Carolina General Assembly
125th Session, 2023-2024
Download This Bill in Microsoft Word Format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
S. 1017
STATUS INFORMATION
General Bill
Sponsors: Senators M. Johnson, Peeler, Climer, Setzler and Kimbrell
Companion/Similar bill(s): 907, 4936
Document Path: LC-0353DG24.docx
Introduced in the Senate on February 1, 2024
Introduced in the House on March 26, 2024
Last Amended on May 7, 2024
Currently residing in conference committee
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date | Body | Action Description with journal page number |
---|---|---|
2/1/2024 | Senate | Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal-page 6) |
2/1/2024 | Senate | Referred to Committee on Finance (Senate Journal-page 6) |
2/28/2024 | Senate | Committee report: Favorable Finance (Senate Journal-page 14) |
3/1/2024 | Scrivener's error corrected | |
3/20/2024 | Senate | Amended (Senate Journal-page 18) |
3/20/2024 | Senate | Read second time (Senate Journal-page 18) |
3/20/2024 | Senate | Roll call Ayes-46 Nays-0 (Senate Journal-page 18) |
3/21/2024 | Scrivener's error corrected | |
3/21/2024 | Senate | Read third time and sent to House (Senate Journal-page 11) |
3/26/2024 | House | Introduced and read first time (House Journal-page 24) |
3/26/2024 | House | Referred to Committee on Ways and Means (House Journal-page 24) |
4/25/2024 | House | Committee report: Favorable with amendment Ways and Means (House Journal-page 20) |
5/2/2024 | House | Requests for debate-Rep(s). Sandifer, Bannister, Long, Bustos, Calhoon, Mitchell, Murphy, Brewer, Whitmire, Robbins, Yow (House Journal-page 21) |
5/7/2024 | House | Amended (House Journal-page 195) |
5/7/2024 | House | Read second time (House Journal-page 195) |
5/7/2024 | House | Roll call Yeas-110 Nays-0 (House Journal-page 197) |
5/8/2024 | House | Read third time and returned to Senate with amendments (House Journal-page 120) |
5/8/2024 | Senate | Non-concurrence in House amendment (Senate Journal-page 220) |
5/9/2024 | House | House insists upon amendment and conference committee appointed Reps. Hewitt, Collins, Ott (House Journal-page 137) |
5/9/2024 | Senate | Conference committee appointed Setzler, M.Johnson, Verdin (Senate Journal-page 31) |
View the latest legislative information at the website
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
02/01/2024
02/28/2024
03/01/2024
03/20/2024
03/21/2024
04/25/2024
05/07/2024
Indicates New Matter
 
Amended
May 07, 2024
 
S. 1017
 
Introduced by Senators M. Johnson, Peeler, Climer, Setzler and Kimbrell
 
S. Printed 05/07/24--H.
Read the first time March 26, 2024
 
________
 
statement of estimated fiscal impact
Explanation of Fiscal Impact
State Expenditure
This bill requires a nonprofit housing corporation, or its instrumentality to have an annual certification of its percentage of ownership from DOR to receive the property tax exemption pursuant to  12-37-220(B)(11). DOR must prescribe the forms by which the nonprofit corporation or its instrumentality may provide the certification requirements. DOR anticipates being able to manage the responsibilities outlined in this bill with minimal expense that can be managed within existing appropriations.
 
Local Revenue
This bill amends  12-37-220(B)(11), which was last amended by Act 145 of 2020, to specify that the property tax exemption for properties owned by nonprofit housing corporations or their instrumentalities that are devoted to providing housing to low or very low-income residents must be proportionate to the nonprofit housing corporation's percentage of direct or indirect economic ownership in the property. This does not apply if the nonprofit housing corporation's ownership interest exceeds 50 percent. Additionally, this does not apply if all of the units in the qualifying property are devoted to providing housing to residents who qualify as low-income under Revenue Procedure 96-32. Further, if the qualifying property is within a zip code in a metropolitan area that uses HUD's SAFMR, low income is expanded to residents who do not exceed 130 percent of the very low-income limit. If these criteria are met, then the property tax exemption is 100 percent. The change applies beginning in tax year 2025. For information, DOR indicates that currently 2,393 exemptions are allowed pursuant to  12-37-220(B)(11)(e).
 
We contacted the South Carolina Association of Counties, MASC, and all counties to determine the potential impact of this bill. The counties of Charleston and Horry provided a response as well as MASC. Charleston County estimates this bill will add $748,000 in assessed value back to the assessment roll, assuming the owners do not change all their units to low-income housing units. Horry County expressed concern about establishing that the housing is used for low-income residents. Additionally, MASC anticipates this bill may have a greater impact on property tax in York County as it is the only county where a property is within a zip code in a metropolitan area that uses HUD's SAFMR. As the requirement for the 100 percent property tax exemption is then based on 130 percent of the very low-income limit more properties in York may be granted the 100 percent property tax exemption relative to other areas within the state but the exemption will likely still apply to fewer properties than are currently exempt.
 
Based on the responses received, RFA anticipates this bill will result in an undetermined increase in local property tax revenue statewide beginning in FY 2025-26, depending upon the number of properties that will see a smaller percentage of the property being exempt due to the ownership percentage of the nonprofit corporation.
 
Additionally, this bill specifies that agricultural property may not be annexed by a municipality without the express written consent of the owner of the property. Municipalities' property taxes include only those properties within municipal boundaries. Based on a response provided by MASC, this provision will have a minimal impact for municipalities as the majority of annexations within the state are by the 100 percent method, requiring a petition signed by 100 percent of the property owners of the property to be annexed.
 
Introduced on February 1, 2024
State Expenditure
This bill requires a nonprofit housing corporation, or its instrumentality to have an annual certification of its percentage of ownership from DOR to receive the property tax exemption pursuant to  12-37-220(B)(11). DOR must prescribe the forms by which the nonprofit corporation or its instrumentality may provide the certification requirements. DOR anticipates being able to manage the responsibilities outlined in this bill with minimal expense that can be managed within existing appropriations.
 
 
Frank A. Rainwater, Executive Director
Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office
 
_______
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A bill
 
TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 12-37-220, RELATING TO PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY OF A NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ONLY APPLIES TO THE PERCENTAGE OF PROPERTY THAT EQUALS THE CORPORATION'S OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, TO PROVIDE AN EXCEPTION, AND TO PROVIDE CERTAIN CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE REQUIREMENTS; AND BY ADDING SECTION 12-37-160 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY ASSESSED AS AGRICULTURAL OR RELATED THERETO MAY NOT BE ANNEXED BY A MUNICIPALITY.
    Amend Title To Conform
 
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina: