In the near future, I intend to introduce legislation to protect victims of domestic violence by removing an abuser’s ability to delay or control divorce proceedings. 
 
Current law generally requires the consent of both parties before a court may bifurcate a divorce proceeding – allowing the marriage to be dissolved while economic claims are still pending.  Although a court may override the mutual consent requirement, it may only do so upon a finding of “compelling circumstances,” which is a high and inconsistently applied standard. 
 
Under this framework, an abusive spouse can effectively veto bifurcation, forcing the victim to remail legally tethered to their abuser for months or even years while litigation over economic issues continues.  This prolongs trauma, increases opportunities for coercion and manipulation, and undermines the victim’s ability to move forward with their life. 
 
My legislation will establish a clear, categorical exception to the mutual consent requirement.  Specifically, my bill will allow courts to grant bifurcation without the consent of both parties when a PFA order is in effect, or a party has been charged with or convicted of a personal injury crime against the other party. 
 
This is a commonsense reform that prioritizes victim safety, reduces opportunities for continued abuse through our legal system, and aligns Pennsylvania law with the realities faced by survivors of domestic abuse. 
 
Please join me in cosponsoring this important legislation.