In the near future, I intend to introduce legislation to amend the Judicial Code to increase the civil jurisdictional limit for magisterial district judges (MDJs) from $12,000 to $20,000.

Pennsylvania’s current $12,000 threshold has not kept pace with inflation or the rising cost of goods, services, and basic repairs.  As a result, many routine disputes are forced into the courts of common pleas, where litigation is more expensive, time-consuming, and procedurally complex.

This legislation would modernize the minor judicial system by allowing MDJs to hear a broader range of everyday civil disputes.  MDJ courts are designed to provide a faster, more accessible, and less formal forum for resolving claims.  By increasing the jurisdictional limit to $20,000, we can:

• Expand access to justice for individuals and small businesses who cannot afford protracted litigation;
• Reduce case backlogs in the courts of common pleas by diverting appropriate claims to MDJ courts; and
• Promote efficient, cost-effective dispute resolution at the local level.

Many neighboring states and jurisdictions have already increased their small claims thresholds to reflect modern economic realities.  This legislation ensures Pennsylvania remains competitive and responsive to the needs of its residents.

Importantly, MDJ decisions remain subject to appeal to the court of common pleas, preserving litigants’ rights while offering an efficient first forum for dispute resolution.

I welcome your support in cosponsoring this commonsense reform to improve access to justice and modernize Pennsylvania’s court system.