In the near future, I intend to introduce a resolution urging the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to adopt a rule governing the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) by attorneys and judges in the practice of law. 
 
This resolution responds to growing concerns about the reliability, accuracy, and ethical implications of using generative AI, including ChatGPT, in the legal profession. While these tools offer convenience and efficiency, they are not infallible.  Indeed, courts across the country have seen an increase in filings containing fabricated legal citations, fictitious case law, and misleading arguments generated by AI.[1]  This has resulted in wasted judicial resources, potential miscarriages of justice, and harm to clients and the integrity of our legal system.
 
My resolution will encourage the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to establish clear standards and guardrails to ensure that the use of AI tools by members of the legal community aligns with existing rules of professional conduct, maintains the integrity of court proceedings, and protects the rights of litigants.  These standards should include clear guidance on the preservation of client confidentiality when using AI platforms and require attorneys to verify that any AI-generated language included in court filings has been thoroughly reviewed for accuracy and compliance with applicable rules of professional conduct. 
 
Significantly, this resolution is not intended to stifle innovation or prevent judges or attorneys from using technology to enhance their practice.  Rather, it seeks to ensure that the fundamental duties of candor toward the tribunal and competency in legal representation remain rooted in human judgment and professional accountability.
 
Efforts are already underway in federal courts, including in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, which have adopted local rules requiring disclosure and verification of AI-generated content. Pennsylvania should act proactively to preserve the integrity of its judicial system and prevent misuse of these powerful albeit unregulated tools.
 
I invite you to join me in co-sponsoring this important resolution to promote professional responsibility and maintain public trust in Pennsylvania courts.