BILL NUMBER: S8491
SPONSOR: HINCHEY
 
TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the public service law, in relation to denials of
increased utility rates and charges
 
PURPOSE:
Mandates that utility rates and charges that are in effect prior to the
denial of a request for an increase rate, charge, or service remain in
effect until the Public Service Commission approves a new rate, charge
or service.
 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1 amends subdivision 12 of section 66 of the Public Service Law
by adding a new paragraph (m) that mandates the utility rates and charg-
es that are in effect prior to the denial of a request for an increase
rate, charge, or service remain in effect until the Public Service
Commission approves a new rate, charge or service.
Section 2 is the effective date which is immediately.
 
JUSTIFICATION:
Under the current Public Service Law, when a utility company files for a
rate increase, the Public Service Commission reviews the request and
votes on a Joint Proposal or Recommended Decision. However, if a majori-
ty of Commissioners vote to deny that Proposal or Decision without an
alternative action in place, the utility's original rate increase
request can automatically take effect. This procedural gap creates a
significant risk that rate increases could be implemented without proper
review and undermines the regulatory process in place to protect rate-
payers. Immediate legislative action is needed to close this dangerous
gap and prevent unapproved rate increases from being forced upon consum-
ers.
In 2023, Central Hudson, a utility in the Mid-Hudson Valley, filed for
substantial increases in delivery rates-32% for electricity and 29% for
gas. The rate case moved through litigation, and after careful review,
the Administrative Law Judge recommended reducing the original rate
increases by 16%. The Public Service Commission (PSC) took further
steps, lowering the final increase to just 5%. However, under the
current Public Service Law, if the majority of the PSC had denied the 5%
increase without proposing an alternative, Central Hudson's original
request could have automatically gone into effect, resulting in a very
significant rate hike. Such a situation is unreasonable and poses an
unnecessary risk to consumers, and it is something New York State must
ensure never happens.
This bill will relieve the Commission of the undue burden of having to
propose an alternative rate plan if they decide to deny the pending rate
increase. It eliminates this problematic situation and provides the PSC
with greater flexibility to perform its role more effectively at the
conclusion of any rate case.
 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New Bill.
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.

Statutes affected:
S8491: 66 public service law, 66(12) public service law