BILL NUMBER: S1000
SPONSOR: BROUK
 
TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the mental hygiene law, in relation to involuntary emer-
gency admission of persons alleged to be mentally ill
 
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:
This bill would allow individuals who are being involuntarily relocated
due to a mental health related issue to choose which hospital they are
admitted to as long as it is reasonable within the specifications list-
ed.
 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1: Short title of the act, shall be known as and may be cited as
"Jesse's law."
Section 2: Adds a new section to the Mental Hygiene Law which allows for
an individual who is being involuntarily moved to a hospital to be able
to choose which hospital they are admitted to. As long as it is not more
than 50 miles and such a hospital has adequate staff and spacing for the
individual.
Section 3: States that within 60 days after this bill becomes a law the
Department of Mental Hygiene must distribute a list to all sheriffs
offices of the hospitals that meet specified criteria of Mental Health
Law section 9.39. The department must also distribute an updated list
anytime those hospital 9.39 statuses change.
Section 4: sets for the effective date.
 
JUSTIFICATION:
This bill is named after Jesse Hubert, a NYS resident who while in his
20's, his mental health started to noticeably decline. In time, it
became a struggle for Jesse to survive day to day. He experienced
psychotic episodes, overdoses, suicidal ideations, and attempts. Crisis
interventions and hospitalizations became a frequent part of Jesse and
his family's lives sometimes occurring weekly. Within just a few months,
Jesse was hospitalized nearly twenty times. While being involuntarily
committed, Jesse had been brought to multiple different hospitals each
time, regardless of if he had a preferred hospital. Jesse and his fami-
ly repeatedly communicated and requested he be transferred to a differ-
ent facility to better suit his treatment needs, but all requests were
denied. Request denials decreased Jesse's want to seek the support to
remain safe, as he did not want to return to an environment that caused
him additional trauma.
There are countless examples of similar concerns for people across the
state. People are refused the opportunity to receive treatment at a
preferred location and often receive less than adequate care. There are
many instances in which certain hospitals would be better fit for
specific individuals being involuntarily committed including differences
in treatment capacity, relationships with staff, and having their
support network closer in location.
To that end, an individual's primary psychiatrist may be based out of a
certain hospital, which would lead to more direct and consistent
care/treatment should the patient be admitted there. Positive relations
with previous staff at a certain hospital can decrease anxiety upon
admittance. And on the contrary, previous negative interactions with
staff at certain hospitals can lead to elevated anxiety. Additionally,
medication regimes can be changed abruptly from hospital to hospital
which can potentially have harmful effects.
This bill recognizes that in not all circumstances it will be reasonable
to honor an individual's choice of hospital while being involuntarily
committed. This bill only allows the choice of hospital in the event the
hospital has adequate space and staffing, and is within 50 miles from
the location the individual is being transported from.
It is the purpose of this legislation to give those struggling with
their mental health a choice to where they will receive care/treatment
when involuntary psychiatric admission is necessary, within reasonable
specifications. Jesse Hubert is now 30 years old and he and his family
advocate that choice is key in a person's recovery.
 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
2022: S7878 Referred to Mental Health.
2023-24: S5179 Referred to Mental Health.
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
To be determined.
 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
On the ninetieth day after it becomes a law.