LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE
ASSEMBLY, No. 3772
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
221st LEGISLATURE
DATED: JUNE 25, 2024
SUMMARY
Synopsis: Revises process for property tax lien holder to foreclose right to
redeem property tax lien; allows property owner to protect remaining
equity.
Type of Impact: Annual decrease in municipal revenues.
Offsetting county cost and revenue increases.
Agencies Affected: Counties and municipalities.
Office of Legislative Services Estimate
Fiscal Impact CY 2024 and Thereafter
Municipal Revenue Decrease Indeterminate
County Cost Increase Indeterminate
County Revenue Increase Indeterminate
 The Office of Legislative Services (OLS) concludes that the bill will result in an indeterminate
reduction in annual municipal revenues and have no net impact on county finances.
 Municipalities will incur a revenue loss because they will no longer be permitted to retain full
proceeds resulting from the sale of foreclosed property for which a municipality holds the tax
sale certificate. Data on the total amount of revenue generated by the sale of these properties
are not compiled on a Statewide basis, hindering a full accounting of the potential impact of
the bill on municipal revenues.
 The OLS anticipates that the bill will not have a net impact on county finances because it
requires county sheriffs to deduct the costs of holding a judicial sale or an Internet auction
from the proceeds of the sale of a property prior to remitting any funds to the property owner,
resulting in offsetting county costs and revenues.
BILL DESCRIPTION
The bill revises the “tax sale law” and the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act to bring these laws into
compliance with the United States Supreme Court decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County,
Office of Legislative Services Legislative Budget and Finance Office
State House Annex Phone (609) 847-3105
P.O. Box 068 Fax (609) 777-2442
Trenton, New Jersey 08625 www.njleg.state.nj.us
 FE to A3772
2
Minnesota et al. concerning the ability of a property owner, whose right to redeem a tax lien on
their property has been foreclosed by the holder of a tax sale certificate, to receive any of the
owner’s equity remaining in the property after the tax lien foreclosure.
Under current law, the holder of a tax sale certificate, after six months, in the case of a
municipality that holds the tax sale certificate or in the case of the holder of a tax sale certificate
on a property that is abandoned, or after two years, in the case of a third party lienholder, may file
suit in Superior Court to foreclose the right of the property owner to redeem the tax lien. Upon
the foreclosure, the lienholder receives title to the property and all of the equity remaining in the
property, leaving the former property owner with no funds from the foreclosure with which to
purchase another property.
The bill amends current law to permit a property owner to require a judicial sale as in the
manner of the foreclosure of a mortgage of the property by the county sheriff in the same manner
as mortgage foreclosures are subject to a judicial sale or an Internet auction of the property through
the office of the county sheriff. The bill requires the property owner to make a motion to the
Superior Court for either a judicial sale or an Internet auction within 45 days of receiving the
complaint for foreclosure or, in the case of an in rem foreclosure, within 45 days of receiving the
complaint for foreclosure or the publication of the notice required by law, whichever date is later.
The bill requires a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the property to be returned to the
property owner or the owner’s heirs.
The bill does not require a property to be sold by judicial sale or an Internet auction if the
property owner does not demand one. However, any property owner will be able to obtain a
judicial sale or Internet auction for the sale of their property by filing a request with the Superior
Court.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
None received.
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
The OLS estimates that the bill will result in an indeterminate decrease in annual municipal
revenues and have no net impact on county finances. Municipalities would experience a decrease
in revenues because they would no longer retain the full amount of revenues generated by the sale
of a foreclosed property. Although municipalities are required to report in their annual financial
statements the amount of revenue generated from the sale of foreclosed property, these data are
not compiled on a Statewide basis and the annual financial statement does not specify what amount
of revenue generated by the sale of foreclosed property constitute surplus funds, hindering a full
accounting of the bill’s impact on municipal revenues.
Current law requires every municipality to hold at least one tax sale per year if the municipality
has delinquent properties. At the tax sale, the title to the delinquent property itself is not sold. The
municipality auctions a tax sale certificate that constitutes a lien on the property. At the auction,
bidders bid down the interest rate that will be paid by the owner for continuing interest on the
certificate amount. The “tax sale law” permits the governing body of a municipality to adopt a
resolution stating that a particular property (or properties) would be useful for a public purpose.
After adopting the resolution, the governing body may authorize a municipal official, other than
the tax collector, to attend the tax sale and bid on the parcel on behalf of the municipality. If the
 FE to A3772
3
municipality is the winning bidder, it holds the tax certificate. If there are no bidders for any parcel
at the sale, the tax collector is required to strike it off in the name of the municipality. In either
case, the municipality has the same rights and remedies as any other purchaser of a tax sale
certificate, including the right to bar or foreclose the right of redemption. Redemption is the right
of an owner to reclaim their property after a tax sale by paying all delinquent taxes, interest, and
other municipal charges assessed on the property.
As noted above, the “tax sale law” allows any holder of a tax sale certificate, including a
municipality, to foreclose the right of the property owner to redeem the tax lien. Before the
Supreme Court’s decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota et al., current law provided
that upon the foreclosure, the lienholder receives title to the property. In this circumstance, if the
lienholder sells the property, they would be entitled to keep all of the revenues generated by its
sale, even if the lienholder is a municipality. Under the bill, and consistent with the decision in
Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota et al., municipalities would no longer be permitted to retain
the full amount of moneys constituting surplus funds following the sale of a foreclosed property.
The bill requires payments to the holder of the tax sale certificate and costs incurred by the county
sheriff for holding the judicial sale or Internet auction to be deducted from the surplus funds.
Additionally, subsequent lienholders are given up to seven months to file a claim for a portion of
the surplus funds with the Superior Court. Any remaining surplus funds are paid to the property
owner. Any unclaimed funds remaining after five years from the date of the judicial sale or Internet
auction are returned to the municipality in which the property is located.
Accordingly, the bill is expected to reduce annual municipal revenues by limiting the amount
of moneys that may be retained by municipalities upon the foreclosure of certain properties for
which the municipality held a tax sale certificate. However, because data is not available
concerning the total value of surplus equity that will be returned to foreclosed property owners in
these circumstances, the OLS is unable to quantify the magnitude of this anticipated municipal
revenue loss.
Although the bill requires a county sheriff to hold, at the request of the property owner, a
judicial sale or an Internet auction for a property subject to foreclosure, the OLS does not expect
this requirement to result in a county net fiscal impact since the bill requires the county sheriff to
deduct the costs of conducting the sale or auction from the proceeds of the sale of the property
prior to remitting any moneys to the property owner, thereby offsetting anticipated cost increases
with corresponding revenue gains.
Section: Revenue, Finance, and Appropriations
Analyst: Scott A. Brodsky
Staff Fiscal & Budget Analyst
Approved: Thomas Koenig
Legislative Budget and Finance Officer
This legislative fiscal estimate has been produced by the Office of Legislative Services due to the
failure of the Executive Branch to respond to our request for a fiscal note.
This fiscal estimate has been prepared pursuant to P.L.1980, c.67 (C.52:13B-6 et seq.).


Statutes affected:
Introduced: 54:5-97.1, 54:5-104.59, 54:5-104.64
Advance Law: 54:5-97.1, 54:5-104.59, 54:5-104.64
Pamphlet Law: 54:5-97.1, 54:5-104.59, 54:5-104.64