This resolution asserts that the directives issued by the judicial branch in the Claremont cases, which require the legislative and executive branches of New Hampshire to define an "adequate education," establish "standards of accountability," and ensure "adequate funding" for public education, are not binding. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining the separation of powers among the three branches of government—legislative, executive, and judicial—as outlined in the New Hampshire Constitution. The resolution argues that adherence to these judicial directives would undermine the republican form of government and set a dangerous precedent by allowing the judiciary to encroach upon the policy-making functions of the legislative and executive branches.

Furthermore, the resolution contends that the judicial branch has historically not exercised authority over educational policy in New Hampshire and that the legislative branch has the constitutional right to determine educational funding and policy without judicial interference. It concludes that the judicial branch lacks the constitutional power to mandate the legislative and executive branches to enact specific definitions or systems related to education, thereby reinforcing the principle that each branch of government must operate within its constitutional limits.