This resolution condemns the judicial doctrine of "disparate impact," which is criticized for relying on univariate analysis to draw causal relationships in complex real-world situations. The resolution argues that such analysis is unscientific and leads to flawed conclusions, suggesting that it legitimizes anti-constitutional practices associated with critical legal theory. This theory is described as lacking limiting principles, allowing for an expansive interpretation of causation that could impose liability and regulatory actions based on tenuous connections.

The resolution calls for the overturning of the "disparate impact" doctrine to protect individual liberties, uphold federalism, and maintain the powers granted to the states. It emphasizes the need for a more restrained approach to government intervention and legal interpretation. Additionally, it mandates that copies of the resolution be sent to key political figures, including the President of the United States and members of the New Hampshire congressional delegation.