This resolution condemns the judicial doctrine of "disparate impact," which is criticized for relying on univariate analysis to establish causation and legal responsibility in complex real-world situations. The resolution argues that such an approach leads to nonsensical conclusions and legitimizes practices associated with "critical legal theory," which lacks limiting principles and can implicate a wide range of factors in legal liability.

The resolution calls for the overturning of the "disparate impact" doctrine as a means to protect individual liberties, uphold federalism, and maintain the powers granted to the states. It also mandates that copies of the resolution be sent to key political figures, including the President of the United States and the New Hampshire congressional delegation.