Legislative Analysis
                                                                                Phone: (517) 373-8080
PHYSICAL THERAPY LICENSURE COMPACT
                                                                                http://www.house.mi.gov/hfa
House Bill 4504 (S-1)                                                           Analysis available at
Sponsor: Rep. John Fitzgerald                                                   http://www.legislature.mi.gov
Senate Bill 1168 (S-1) as passed by the Senate
Sponsor: Sen. Sylvia A. Santana
House Committee (HB 4504): Health Policy
House Committee (SB 1168): [Placed on second reading]
Senate Committee: Health Policy
Complete to 12-19-24
SUMMARY:
           House Bill 4504 and Senate Bill 1168 would amend the Public Health Code to enter Michigan
           into the Physical Therapy Licensure Compact (PTLC), which allows physical therapists to
           practice physical therapy in states that are parties to the compact without having to be licensed
           in each individual state. 1 (A compact is like a contract between states that they enter into by
           enacting its provisions as law.) House Bill 4504 would make Michigan a party to the PTLC,
           and Senate Bill 1168 would make related changes to the code’s physical therapy licensure
           provisions.
           House Bill 4504 would add section 16188 to the Public Health Code to enter Michigan into
           the PTLC, which is included in full in the bill and described briefly below.
           Article 1: Purpose
           The PTLC states that its purpose is to facilitate interstate practice of physical therapy with a
           goal of improving access, while preserving the regulatory authority of states to protect health
           and safety through their current systems of licensure.
           Article 2: Definitions
           This article defines 22 terms that pertain to the execution of the duties outlined in the PTLC.
           Notably, compact privilege is defined as the authorization (equivalent to a license) granted by
           a state to allow a licensee from another member state to practice as a physical therapist or work
           as a physical therapist assistant in the remote state under its laws and rules. The practice of
           physical therapy is considered to occur in the member state where the patient or client is located
           at the time of the encounter.
           Article 3: State participation in the compact
           To participate in the PTLC, a state must do all of the following:
               • Comply with the rules of the Physical Therapy Compact Commission.
               • Use a recognized national examination as a requirement for licensure.
               • Have continuing competence requirements as a condition of license renewal.
1
    https://ptcompact.org/
House Fiscal Agency                                                                               Page 1 of 6
           •   Participate fully in the commission’s data system, including using the commission’s
               unique identifier. (The data system is described below.)
           •   Have a mechanism in place for receiving and investigating complaints about licensees.
           •   Notify the commission, as provided in the PTLC and rules, of any adverse action or
               the availability of investigative information regarding a licensee.
           •   Fully implement a criminal background check requirement by receiving the results of
               the FBI criminal background check and using the results to make licensure decisions.
       Additionally, upon adoption of the bill, Michigan would have the authority to obtain biometric-
       based information from physical therapy licensure applicants and submit this information to
       the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for a criminal background check.
       A member state must grant the compact privilege to an individual who holds a valid
       unencumbered licenses in another member state and may charge a fee for granting it.
       Article 4: Compact privilege
       To exercise the compact privilege under the PTLC, a licensee must do all of the following:
           • Hold a license in the home state.
           • Have no encumbrance on any state license.
           • Be eligible for compact privilege in any member state.
           • Have not had any adverse action against any license or compact privilege within the
               previous two years.
           • Notify the commission that the licensee is seeking the compact privilege in a remote
               state.
           • Pay any applicable fees, including any state fee, for the compact privilege.
           • Meet any jurisprudence requirements established by the remote state in which the
               licensee is seeking a compact privilege.
           • Report to the commission adverse action taken by any non-member state within 30
               days after that action.
       To maintain the compact privilege, a licensee must comply with the requirements above. The
       compact privilege is valid until the expiration date of the home license.
       The licensee must function within the laws and regulations of the remote state and is subject
       to that state’s regulatory authority. The remote state may remove a licensee’s compact
       privilege, impose fines, or take any other necessary actions to protect its citizens.
       If a licensee’s home state license is encumbered, the licensee must lose the compact privilege
       in remote states until the home state license is no longer encumbered and two years have passed
       from the date of the adverse action. Then, the licensee must meet the requirements listed above
       for obtaining the compact privilege in any remote state.
       If a licensee’s compact privilege in any remote state is removed, the licensee must lose privilege
       in remote states until the time for removal has passed, all fines are paid, and two years have
       passed from the date of the adverse action. Then, the licensee must meet the requirements listed
       above for obtaining the compact privilege in any remote state.
House Fiscal Agency                                                    HB 4504 and SB 1168    Page 2 of 6
       Article 5: Active duty military personnel or their spouses
       An active duty military licensee or their spouse could designate the home of record, permanent
       change of station (PCS), or state of current residence as the home state.
       Article 6: Adverse actions
       Under the compact, a home state has the exclusive power to impose adverse actions against a
       physical therapy license issued by the home state and may also take adverse actions based on
       the investigative information of a remote state, using its own procedures. A member state may
       still participate in an alternative program in lieu of adverse action. A remote state may take
       adverse actions against a licensee’s compact privilege in the state and issue subpoenas. A party
       state must enforce subpoenas issued by a physical therapy licensing board for attendance and
       testimony of witnesses or production of evidence from another party state.
       Member states may participate in joint investigations against a licensee and must share any
       investigative, litigation, or compliance materials in furtherance of any joint or individual
       investigation under the compact.
       Article 7: Physical Therapy Compact Commission
       The compact creates a commission composed of one delegate from each member state, each
       of whom is a current member of that state’s licensing board as well as a physical therapist,
       physical therapist assistant, public member, or the board administrator. According to rules
       specified in the compact, the commission must meet at least annually and establish bylaws and
       uniform rules, maintain financial records, take actions to further the compact and bylaws, and
       prosecute legal actions (without affecting the standing of individual state physical therapy
       licensing boards to sue or be sued), in addition to other responsibilities.
       A nine-member executive board, composed of seven elected members of the commission, a
       member of a national physical therapy professional association, and a member from the
       recognized membership organization of the physical therapy licensing boards, can act on behalf
       of the commission.
       The compact provides that all commission meetings must be open to the public, with public
       notice of the meetings. However, the commission or executive board may convene in closed
       nonpublic meetings if they must discuss noncompliance of a member state; employment,
       compensation, or discipline related to specific employees; current or prospective litigation; or
       other specified sensitive topics.
       Further, the compact prescribes the allowable payments of expenses, receipt of money, and
       assessments levied on member states. The commission must keep accurate accounts of all
       receipts and disbursements, which are subject to an annual audit.
       The compact also specifies the individual and collective liability of members of the
       commission.
       Article 8: Data system
       The commission must develop, maintain, and use a coordinated database and reporting system
       containing licensure, adverse action, and investigative information on all licensees in member
       states. Member states must submit the identifying information, licensure data, adverse actions
House Fiscal Agency                                                   HB 4504 and SB 1168   Page 3 of 6
       taken, and other information regarding all licensees. The compact must specify the sharing of
       this information, including adverse actions.
       Article 9: Rulemaking
       The commission must exercise its rulemaking powers, with rules or amendments to the rules
       adopted at regular or special meetings and notice given at least 30 days before consideration
       of the rule. A public hearing must convened before adopting a rule or amendment if that hearing
       is requested by at least 25 individuals, a state or federal governmental subdivision or agency,
       or an association that has at least 25 members. The commission then takes final action on the
       proposed rule by a majority vote of all members.
       If a majority of the legislatures of the member states reject a rule (by enactment of a statute or
       resolution in the same manner used to adopt the compact) within four years of the rule’s
       adoption, the rule has no further force and effect.
       Article 10: Oversight, dispute resolution, and enforcement
       State officials must enforce the compact and take necessary actions to effectuate its purposes
       and intent. The compact and the rules promulgated under it have standing as statutory law.
       If the commission determines that a member state has defaulted in the performance of its
       obligations or responsibilities under the compact, it must provide notice of the default and any
       actions to be taken to all member states. A defaulting state may be terminated from the compact
       as a last resort upon a majority vote of the member states. The defaulting state may then appeal
       that action by petitioning the U.S. District Court for Washington, D.C., or the applicable federal
       district. The commission also must promulgate a rule providing for both mediation and binding
       dispute resolution for disputes as appropriate.
       Article 11: Implementation date, withdrawal, and amendment
       The compact comes into effect once it is enacted into law in the tenth member state, and the
       compact provisions take effect at that time. Any state that joins the compact subsequently is
       subject to the rules as they exist on the date the compact becomes law in that state.
       A member state may withdraw from the compact by enacting a statute to repeal it, with the
       withdrawal taking effect six months after the repealing statute.
       The compact can be amended by the member states, and no amendment to the compact is
       effective and binding on any member state until enacted into the laws of all member states.
       Article 12: Construction and severability
       The compact provisions are severable, and if any part of it is held invalid, the remainder of the
       compact and its applicability is not affected.
       Proposed MCL 333.16188
       Senate Bill 1168 would amend the physical therapy provisions of the Public Health Code to
       allow individuals authorized under the PTLC to engage in the practice of physical therapy or
       to practice as a physical therapist assistant. Currently, only individuals licensed in Michigan
       may do so. The bill would provide that, for purposes of Article 15 (Occupations) of the code,
House Fiscal Agency                                                    HB 4504 and SB 1168    Page 4 of 6
        including the obligations of licensure, an individual who holds a compact privilege under the
        PTLC to practice as a physical therapist or a physical therapist assistant is considered a physical
        therapist or a physical therapist assistant, as applicable, who is licensed under Part 178
        (Physical Therapy) of the code. The fee for an individual seeking to hold a compact privilege
        under the PTLC would be $90 per year.
        The bill would also require the Michigan Board of Physical Therapy to select either the director
        of LARA or the director’s designee as the state’s delegate for purposes of the PTLC.
        MCL 333.17801 and proposed MCL 333.17820a and 333.17820b
        Effectiveness provisions
        House Bill 4504 would take effect 90 days after being enacted.
        Senate Bill 1168 would take effect one year after being enacted.
        Neither bill could take effect unless both bills were enacted.
BACKGROUND:
        Taken together, the bills are substantively identical to Senate Bill 18 of the 2021-22 legislative
        session, which was passed by the Senate and reported from the House Committee on Health
        Policy.
        House Bill 4504 was passed by the House and has been referred to the Committee of the Whole
        in the Senate as an S-1 substitute, described above. The S-1 substitute is identical to the H-1
        substitute passed by the House, except that the S-1 ties the bill to Senate Bill 1168 rather than
        to the similar House Bill 4505.
BRIEF DISCUSSION:
        As of April 2024, 36 states and the District of Columbia have either become member states in
        the PTLC or have enacted legislation to do so. 2 Supporters argue that allowing physical therapy
        providers to work in multiple states can help to generally improve patient access to physical
        therapy services, relieve staffing shortages in the field (which have been especially acute since
        the COVID-19 pandemic), promote public protection in the form of shared background checks
        and disciplinary information, facilitate flexibility in light of the increasing use of telehealth
        services, and provide mobility for physical therapy health professionals (including the spouses
        of military service members).
        Michigan has joined two other interstate health licensure portability compacts, the Psychology
        Interjurisdictional Compact 3 and the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact (which applies to
2
  https://ptcompact.org/ptc-states The member states are Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana,
Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah,
Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. The states that have enacted legislation but are not yet full
members are Alabama, Connecticut, Kansas, Maine, Pennsylvania, and Vermont.
3
  https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=MCL-333-16190
House Fiscal Agency                                                          HB 4504 and SB 1168      Page 5 of 6
       physicians and will be repealed on March 28, 2025). 4 Others recently proposed include the
       Nurse Licensure Compact 5 and the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact. 6
FISCAL IMPACT:
       House Bill 4504 and Senate Bill 1168 could have a significant fiscal impact on the Department
       of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, although a precise estimate of the magnitude of the impact
       is currently unavailable.
       Under House Bill 4504, LARA would incur costs for investigating complaints against licensees
       and for the general administration and implementation of the compact’s requirements; such
       costs would include any incurred expenses for integrating Michigan’s current data system with
       the compact commission’s data system. The Physical Therapy Compact Commission could
       also levy an annual assessment on Michigan (such an assessment is levied on all compact
       members) to cover the costs of the commission’s activities and operations. The magnitude of
       the costs is presently unknown, as LARA indicated that the cost would be dependent on the
       volume of compact licensees that practice within Michigan. The state would also face liabilities
       if it defaulted on the compact. The bill would allow LARA to recover some of its costs, namely
       via fines on licensees related to adverse disciplinary action and cost recovery related to
       investigations and dispositions of adverse action cases.
       Senate Bill 1168 would require LARA to collect an annual fee of $90 from individuals seeking
       to hold compact privilege under the physical therapy licensure compact. The amount of revenue
       collected would depend on the volume of individuals choosing to practice under the compact.
       It is unclear how revenues under the bills would compare to the costs that LARA and the state
       would incur. Furthermore, LARA indicated that traditional licensure revenues in the state
       would likely decline, as out-of-state licensees would be able to practice via the compact, instead
       of securing licensure through the state.