UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES S.B. 1022 (S-1):
SUMMARY OF BILL
REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE
Senate Bill 1022 (Substitute S-1 as reported)
Sponsor: Senator Sam Singh
Committee: Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection
CONTENT
The bill would amend the Michigan Consumer Protection Act to do the following:
-- Establish specific fines for a violation of the Act that targeted an elder or vulnerable adult.
-- Allow the Attorney General or prosecuting attorney, before bringing an action in court, to
serve a written demand to a person suspected of having information related to a violation
of the Act that required the person to provide the information.
-- Create the Consumer Protection and Antitrust Revolving Enforcement and Education Fund,
require costs and proceeds from proceedings under the Act to be deposited into the Fund,
and require the Attorney General to spend money from the Fund for the Act’s enforcement.
MCL 445.902 et al.
BRIEF RATIONALE
According to testimony, Michigan’s statutory protections for elderly or vulnerable-adult
consumers have fallen behind protections enacted by other states. Some argue that this has
left these consumers susceptible to deceptive practices in already-regulated industries, such
as unfair charges in assisted living facilities or inflated prices in estate planning. It has been
suggested that State law discourage actors from targeting elderly or vulnerable adults by
establishing specific penalties for such targeting.
Legislative Analyst: Nathan Leaman
FISCAL IMPACT
The bill likely would have a negative but minimal fiscal impact on the Department of Treasury.
Under the bill, the newly-created Fund could accrue a significant balance, depending on the
magnitude of the attorney fees, costs, and proceeds that were designated for deposit. Money
in the Fund would remain in the Fund at the close of the fiscal year and would not lapse to
the General Fund. Directing the investment and managing interest and earnings of a fund
with a balance in excess of $1.0 million could result in administrative costs for Treasury, but
it is unlikely that these costs would require a notable increase in appropriations. The
Department of Attorney General would be the primary administrator.
The bill would not likely increase costs for the Attorney General. While the bills would create
additional pathways for the Attorney General to pursue criminal activity under the Act, the
language to do so is permissive. Additionally, increased enforcement under the Act could be
covered partially or entirely by the Consumer Protection and Antitrust Revolving Enforcement
and Education Fund created by the bill.
The bill could have a positive fiscal impact on the State and local units of government. The
bill would impose a civil fine of varying amounts from $10,000 to $50,000. Additional
provisions proposed in the bill could increase the number of civil fines imposed; however, the
Page 1 of 2 sb1022/2324
amount of additional revenue is indeterminate and dependent on the number of fines
imposed. Revenue collected from civil fines is used to support local libraries. Additionally, $10
of the civil fine would be deposited into the State Justice System Fund. This Fund supports
justice-related activities across State government in the Departments of Corrections, Health
and Human Services, State Police, and Treasury. The Fund also supports justice-related issues
in the Legislative Retirement System and the Judiciary. The amount of revenue to the State
or for local libraries is indeterminate and dependent on the actual number of violations.
Date Completed: 11-25-24 Fiscal Analyst: Joe Carrasco, Jr.
Elizabeth Raczkowski
Michael Siracuse
SAS\Floors2324\sb1022
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official
statement of legislative intent.
Page 2 of 2 Bill Analysis @ www.senate.michigan.gov/sfa sb1022/2324


Statutes affected:
Substitute (S-1): 445.902
Senate Introduced Bill: 445.902
As Passed by the Senate: 445.902