TEMP. LOCKING DEVICES; CHILDCARE S.B. 906-908:
ANALYSIS AS PASSED BY THE SENATE
Senate Bills 906 through 908 (as passed by the Senate)
Sponsor: Senator Jeremy Moss (S.B. 906 & 907)
Senator Mallory McMorrow (S.B. 908)
Committee: Regulatory Affairs
Date Completed: 8-29-24
RATIONALE
Public Act (PA) 45 of 2020 amended PA 306 of 1937, which governs the construction,
reconstruction, and remodeling of school buildings, to allow temporary door locking devices
or systems to be installed in school buildings. According to testimony before the Senate
Committee on Regulatory Affairs, PA 45 was intended to allow child care organizations that
are not affiliated with schools to also install temporary door locking devices. Reportedly, upon
the Act’s enactment, some child care organizations sought to install temporary locking devices
in their facilities; however, the waiver granted to schools under the Fire Prevention Code at
that time was not granted to unaffiliated child care centers. Some people believe that child
care organizations and day care centers that are not affiliated with schools should be allowed
to use temporary door locking devices to prevent harm to children in violent emergency
situations.
CONTENT
Senate Bill 906 would amend the Single State Construction Code Act to do to the
following:
-- Allow a temporary locking device to be installed in a child care center.
-- Prescribe standards, procedures, and permit and installation processes for the
use of temporary locking devices or systems in child care centers.
-- Require the operator of a child care center to submit installation plans for review
and approval from an enforcing agency and notify relevant authorities of an
installation.
-- Require the operator of a child care center to provide employees with training in
the temporary locking system and document such training.
-- Allow a child care center to use an existing temporary locking device so long as
the device complied with the bill's standards and the operator had an inspection
from and approval by an enforcing agency.
-- Specify that a child care center would not have to submit to the Department of
Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA), plans that were signed and sealed by a
licensed architect or licensed professional engineer to install or approve an
existing temporary locking device.
-- Require a child care center to comply with an emergency procedure plan within
90 days of the bill's effective date and specify that the plan would have to include
a description of the installation and use of the temporary locking device or
systems used by the operator of the child care center.
Senate Bill 907 would amend the Fire Prevention Code to specify that a temporary
locking device installed in accordance with the Single State Construction Act as
proposed by Senate Bill 906 would not violate the Code.
Page 1 of 4 sb906-908/2324
Senate Bill 908 would amend the child care licensing Act to allow a temporary
locking device or system to be installed in a child care center in accordance with the
Single State Construction Code Act as proposed by Senate Bill 906.
Senate Bill 906 is described in greater detail below.
Senate Bill 906
Temporary Locking Device Standards
The bill would amend the Single State Construction Code Act to specify that all the following
would apply to the installation and use of a temporary locking device or system in a child care
center:
-- The device or system was portable and would not be permanently affixed to the door;
however, individual parts of the locking assembly of the device or system including bolts,
stops, brackets, and pins that did not prevent ingress and egress through the door could
be permanently mounted on a labeled fire door assembly.
-- The locking means was capable of being engaged without opening the door.
-- The door was capable of being unlocked and opened outside the room with a tool or key.
-- The locking means did not modify the door closure, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware.
-- The device or system could be disengaged by an individual on the interior side of the door
without the use of a key or special tool.
-- Installation and operation of the fixed elements of the device or door system was in
compliance with Public Act 1 of 1966, which provides for the accessibility and use of public
facilities by people with physical limitations.
-- A properly trained firefighter, law enforcement officer, or child care center staff member
was able to release the locking device or system from outside.
-- The device could provide notification of its location and placement in the event of a
lockdown.
-- The device or system could not be installed on doors leading outside the child care center
from a corridor.
-- The device or system would have to be installed in compliance with the installation
requirements described below.
-- Any fasteners or through bolt penetrations to a labeled fire door assembly would have to
be made of steel.
-- Holes, bolts, or fasteners, made or used to install a device or system would have to be
made in the same installation instructions described below.
"Child care center" would mean that term as defined in the child care licensing Act: a facility,
other than a private residence, receiving one or more children under 13 years of age for care
for periods of less than 24 hours a day, where the parents or guardians are not immediately
available to the child. The term would include a facility that provides care for at least two
consecutive weeks, regardless of the number of hours of care per day. The facility would be
generally described as a child care center, day care center, day nursery, nursery school,
parent cooperative preschool, play group, before- or after-school program, or drop-in center.
The term would not include any of the following:
-- A Sunday school, a vacation bible school, or a religious instructional class that was
conducted by a religious organization where children were attending for not more than
three hours per day for an indefinite period or for not more than eight hours per day for
a period not to exceed four weeks during a 12-month period.
Page 2 of 4 sb906-908/2324
-- A facility operated by a religious organization where children were in the religious
organization's care for not more than three hours while persons responsible for the
children were attending religious services.
-- A program that was primarily supervised, school-age-child-focused training in a specific
subject, including, but not limited to, dancing, drama, music, or religion.
-- A program that was primarily an incident of group athletic or social activities for school-
age children sponsored by or under the supervision of an organized club or hobby group,
including, but not limited to, youth clubs, scouting, and school-age recreational or
supplementary education programs.
-- A program that primarily provided therapeutic services to a child.
"Temporary locking device or system" or "device or system" would mean an anchoring
mechanism or system installed on the interior side of a door that when engaged, secures the
door against forced entry. "Panic hardware" would mean fire door hardware, handles, or push
bars that allow for the opening of the door with a single movement.
Child Care Center Duties
Except as otherwise provided, the operator of a child care center would have to do all the
following:
-- Before installing a device or system in the child care center, submit to the enforcing agency
two copies of the floor plans, drawings, diagrams, and installation instructions for plan
review, obtain plan review approval, and obtain a permit for installation as provided by
the Single State Construction Code Act and the Fire Prevention Code, and notify the local
fire department and law enforcement agency that had jurisdiction over the child care
center of the intended installation or use, and location, of the device or system.
-- Before using a newly installed device or system in the child care center, notify the
enforcing agency that the device or system was ready for inspection and receive written
notice from the enforcing agency that the device or system was approved for use.
-- Provide in-service training to child care staff members on the use of the device or system
in the child care center where the device or system was installed or being used and have
the center's operator maintain a file on record to verify the training.
-- Ensure that the device or system was engaged for only a finite period of time, as
determined by the operator of the child care center in accordance with an emergency
procedure plan adopted in accordance with licensing rules for child care centers.
The bill specifies that a child care center would have to comply with an emergency procedure
plan within 90 days of the bill's effective date and that the plan would have to include a
description of the installation and use of the temporary locking device or systems used by the
operator of the child care center.
Use of Existing Temporary Locking Device
Unless otherwise provided, if a child care center had an existing temporary device or system
that was installed before the bill's effective date, the enforcing agency would have to approve
the device or system if all the following requirements were met:
-- Within one year of the bill's effective date, the operator of the child care center submitted
to the enforcing agency two copies of drawings, diagrams, and installation instructions
that showed that the device met Temporary Locking Device Standards' requirements.
-- The operator of the child care center applied for and obtained any necessary permits
required by the Act and the Fire Prevention Code, described above.
Page 3 of 4 sb906-908/2324
-- The enforcing agency inspected the installed device or system and determined that it met
the requirements under Child Care Center Duties.
Allowed Actions Without LARA or Enforcing Agency Approval
Under the bill, notwithstanding any rules, regulations, or guidelines promulgated by LARA to
the contrary, the operator of a child care center would not have to provide LARA or an
enforcing agency construction documents that were sealed and signed by a licensed architect
or licensed professional engineer before doing any of the following:
-- Newly installing a temporary door locking device or system in a child care center.
-- Receiving approval for an existing temporary door locking device or system that was
installed in a child care center before the bill's effective date.
The bill specifies that a temporary locking device or system could be installed in any child
care center or addition to a child care center regardless of the cost of that construction,
reconstruction, or remodeling.
Enforcement
Additionally, the Code specifies that a labeled fire door assembly with a temporary locking
device or system installed in a school building does not violate the Act. Under the bill, this
provision also would apply to a temporary locking device or system installed in a child care
center in accordance with the bill.
MCL 125.1528 et al. (S.B. 906); 29.22 (S.B. 907); Proposed MCL 722.113m (S.B. 908)
ARGUMENTS
(Please note: The arguments contained in this analysis originate from sources outside the Senate Fiscal Agency. The
Senate Fiscal Agency neither supports nor opposes legislation.)
Supporting Argument
The bill would provide child care facilities more options to ensure safety. According to the Gun
Violence Archive, there were at least 20 mass shootings1 in Michigan each year from 2020 to
2022, an increase from the 2014 to 2019 average of 10.2 School shootings are not uncommon.
In 2021, four students were killed in a mass shooting at Oxford High School in Oxford
Township, Michigan. In 2023, three students attending Michigan State University were killed
in a shooting. As a result of the increasing threat of gun violence, some schools and child care
centers implemented new security measures. The bills would allow child care organizations to
install temporary door locking devices in their facilities to this end; however, the bills would
not require their installation, affording facilities flexibility when making security decisions.
Legislative Analyst: Nathan Leaman
FISCAL IMPACT
The bills would have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on local units of government and
no fiscal impact on the State. The costs to the local units of government would occur as
additional administrative costs and would likely be minimal.
Fiscal Analyst: Bobby Canell
1
The Archive defines mass shooting as one in which four victims are injured or killed, not including the
shooter.
2
Khan, Nisa, "Tracking mass shootings in Michigan", Michigan Public Radio. Retrieved 8-26-24.
SAS\A2324\s906a
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official
statement of legislative intent.
Page 4 of 4 sb906-908/2324


Statutes affected:
Senate Introduced Bill: 125.1528
As Passed by the Senate: 125.1528