Legislative Analysis
Phone: (517) 373-8080
SALES THRESHOLD FOR LICENSURE EXEMPTION FOR
http://www.house.mi.gov/hfa
RETAIL OUTLETS SELLING MAPLE SYRUP OR HONEY
Analysis available at
Senate Bill 882 as passed by the Senate http://www.legislature.mi.gov
Sponsor: Sen. Sam Singh
House Committee: Agriculture
Senate Committee: Energy and Environment
Complete to 12-18-24
SUMMARY:
Senate Bill 882 would amend section 4105 of the Food Law to increase the threshold for how
much honey or maple syrup can be sold before licensure by the Michigan Department of
Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) is required under the act.
Currently, section 4105 provides for an exemption from licensure as a food establishment or
food processing facility involving the sale or processing of honey or maple syrup if the
producer has gross sales of $15,001 or less. If a retail outlet is owned by the producer and sells
only prepackaged honey or maple syrup that was made in Michigan and the processing facility
is licensed, then the retail outlet is exempt from having to become licensed as a food
establishment under the Food Law.
The bill would increase this sales threshold to $25,000, 1 matching the existing threshold for
the value of foods that are allowed to be sold under the state’s cottage food laws without the
individual making those goods needing to obtain licensure. Honey and maple syrup are not
considered cottage food products under state law.
Cottage food product means a food that is not potentially hazardous food as that term
is defined in the Food Code. Examples of cottage food product include jams, jellies,
dried fruit, candy, cereal, granola, dry mixes, vinegar, dried herbs, and baked goods
that do not require temperature control for safety.
Cottage food product does not include any potentially hazardous food regulated under
21 CFR parts 113 and 114, 2 examples of which include meat and poultry products;
salsa; milk products; bottled water and other beverages; and home-produced ice
products. Cottage food product also does not include canned low-acid fruits or acidified
vegetables and other canned foods except for jams, jellies, and preserves as defined in
21 CFR part 150. 3
MCL 289.4105
1
House Bill 6131 proposes to increase this threshold to $45,000 by default, with the potential for up to $75,000 in
annual gross sales.
2
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-113 and https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-
21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-114
3
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-150
House Fiscal Agency Page 1 of 2
BACKGROUND:
According to House committee testimony from a representative of the Sustainable Beekeepers
Guild of Michigan, the current sales limit on honey discourages local production. As an
example, they noted that an individual with 20 bee colonies can produce up to 2,000 pounds of
honey in a slower year, which would yield revenue of approximately $20,000 at the going rate
of $10 a pound. Because licensed facilities are difficult to find for small-scale beekeepers, and
building an appropriate facility for processing is cost-prohibitive for a sole proprietor at this
scale, in order to comply with state law beekeepers must choose between losing money by
forgoing sales to stay under the sales threshold or spending much more to have their honey
processed in a commercial facility without the benefit of additional profit.
Other states in the Midwest either have higher sales limits for cottage foods or have no sales
limit but stricter regulations as to which food items qualify as a cottage food and how and
where cottage foods may be sold.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Senate Bill 882 would have no direct fiscal impact on the state or local units of government.
POSITIONS:
A representative of the Sustainable Beekeepers Guild of Michigan testified in support of the
bill. (12-11-24)
The following entities indicated support for the bill (12-11-24):
• Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
• Michigan Farm Bureau
• Michigan Farmers Market Association
Legislative Analyst: Josh Roesner
Fiscal Analyst: William E. Hamilton
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency staff for use by House members in their
deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.
House Fiscal Agency SB 882 as reported from House committee Page 2 of 2

Statutes affected:
Senate Introduced Bill: 289.4105
As Passed by the Senate: 289.4105