Legislative Analysis
Phone: (517) 373-8080
ALLOW DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS TO INCLUDE AREAS
http://www.house.mi.gov/hfa
SEPARATED BY A BODY OF WATER
Analysis available at
Senate Bill 700 (S-1) as passed by the Senate http://www.legislature.mi.gov
Sponsor: Sen. Kevin Hertel
House Committee: Economic Development and Small Business
Senate Committee: Local Government
Complete to 12-10-24
SUMMARY:
Senate Bill 700 would amend Part 2 (Downtown Development Authorities) of the Recodified
Tax Increment Financing Act to allow a municipality’s designated downtown district to include
two areas separated by a body of water if the municipality is located on the mainland and one
or more islands.
The Recodified Tax Increment Financing Act authorizes the use of various tax increment
finance authorities (TIFAs) in Michigan, including downtown development authorities
(DDAs). TIFAs are entities that “capture” increases in property tax revenue in designated tax
increment finance (TIF) districts. Because the increase in property values in a TIF district is
expected to be attributable to the TIFA’s development of that area, any tax revenue increases
beyond what the property originally yielded go to the TIFA.
Generally speaking, when a local unit of government creates a downtown development
authority, it establishes a special downtown district and then captures the tax revenues that
stem from future increases in property values within that district for the DDA to use to promote
the economic development of the district.
The act defines downtown district as the part of an area in a city, village, or township
business district that is specifically designated as such via ordinance. A downtown
district may include multiple separate and distinct geographic areas in a business
district under specified circumstances, and those areas are considered part of one
designated downtown district.
(A downtown district may include multiple separate and distinct areas within a business district
if a municipality enters into an interlocal agreement with a township that was previously
ineligible to create a DDA, is adjacent to a municipality with a DDA, and is a member of the
same joint planning commission as that municipality, or if the municipality is a city
surrounding another city and that other city is between the separate and distinct areas.)
Senate Bill 700 would amend the definition of downtown district to provide that, in a
municipality located on both the mainland and one or more islands where a body of water lies
between two separate and distinct downtown areas, a singular downtown district can include
both of those areas.
MCL 125.4201
House Fiscal Agency Page 1 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
Senate Bill 700 would have a fiscal impact limited in scope, as the provisions of the bill are
specific to local units located on the mainland and one or more island. The intent of the bill
appears to be an authorization of the Clay Township DDA to include geographic area on
Harsens Island. Based on the TIF plan, the township does not appear to capture state property
tax revenues (State Education Tax) or school operating taxes. To the extent that the local unit
expands the geographic territory of the DDA, the DDA would be authorized to capture property
tax revenue growth from an established base year otherwise allocated to the applicable local
taxing units. The scope of the revenue capture would depend on taxable values and millage
rates within the geographic area. A DDA, like other tax increment financing authorities,
captures the incremental growth of local property taxes over a period of time to fund downtown
development activities.
It is unclear if there are other local units that would be affected by the provisions of the bill.
To the extent that there are, any fiscal impact would be a function of the taxable values, local
taxing unit millages, and millage rates in the geographic area affected by the establishment of
the DDA.
Legislative Analyst: Holly Kuhn
Fiscal Analyst: Ben Gielczyk
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House Fiscal Agency staff for use by House members in their
deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.
House Fiscal Agency SB 700 (S-1) as passed by the Senate Page 2 of 2
Statutes affected: Substitute (S-1): 125.4201
Senate Introduced Bill: 125.4201
As Passed by the Senate: 125.4201