Division of the Budget
Landon State Office Building Phone: (785) 296-2436
900 SW Jackson Street, Room 504 adam.c.proffitt@ks.gov
Topeka, KS 66612 Division of the Budget http://budget.kansas.gov
Adam Proffitt, Director Laura Kelly, Governor
March 13, 2023
The Honorable Caryn Tyson, Chairperson
Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation
300 SW 10th Avenue, Room 548-S
Topeka, Kansas 66612
Dear Senator Tyson:
SUBJECT: Fiscal Note for SB 274 by Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation
In accordance with KSA 75-3715a, the following fiscal note concerning SB 274 is
respectfully submitted to your committee.
SB 274 would require the county appraiser use the cost approach for property tax appraisals
of special purpose property, but the appraiser could also use one or more other methods to value
the property. For property tax purposes, the fair market value of special purpose property would
be determined based solely on the value of the land and real property improvements and would
exclude the value of the business operating on the property. If the appraiser determines that the
fair market value of a special purpose property exceeds the replacement cost less depreciation of
the real property improvements and the value of the land, the appraiser would be required to
explain in writing, upon the request of the taxpayer, how the appraiser determined the fair market
value based solely on the value of the land and real property improvements and excluding the value
of the business operating on the property. The bill defines “special purpose property” as property
designed for a unique use and layout and that is not readily converted to another use. Special
purpose property includes, but is not limited to, bowling alleys, car washes, hotels and motels,
self-service storage facilities, automobile dealerships, nursing homes, assisted living facilities,
grain handling and storage facilities, and commercial feed yards. Special purpose property would
not include public utility property.
The Department of Revenue estimates that SB 274 would have no fiscal effect on state and
local property revenue, as this change would not prevent a county appraiser from arriving at an
estimate of fair market value for special use property. The Kansas Association of Counties
indicates the cost approach would be most suitable for appraisal of special purpose properties,
because of the distinctive nature of the properties and the lack of adequate sales and income data.
The Honorable Caryn Tyson, Chairperson
Page 2—SB 274
This approach has the potential provide stability to counties property tax revenue from special
purpose properties.
The League of Kansas Municipalities indicates the bill has the potential to reduce local
property tax revenues that are used in part to finance local governments. The League indicates the
bill would allow the cost approach to be used to determine fair market value for other types of
special purpose property, not just the items specifically listed in the bill. However, the League
does not have a basis on which to estimate the amount of lower possible property tax valuations to
make a precise estimate of the fiscal effect on local governments.
Sincerely,
Adam Proffitt
Director of the Budget
cc: Lynn Robinson, Department of Revenue
Craig Neuenswander, Department of Education
Wendi Stark, League of Kansas Municipalities
Jay Hall, Kansas Association of Counties