The Florida Senate
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.)
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules
BILL: CS/SB 7008
INTRODUCER: Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee; and Regulated Industries
Committee
SUBJECT: OGSR/Department of the Lottery
DATE: January 29, 2024 REVISED:
ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION
Kraemer Imhof RI Submitted as Comm. Bill/Fav
1. McVaney McVaney GO Fav/CS
2. Kraemer Twogood RC Favorable
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes
I. Summary:
CS/SB 7008 saves from repeal the current public records exemption in s. 24.1051, F.S., making
confidential and exempt from public inspection and copying requirements certain information
held by the Florida Department of the Lottery (department). Specifically, the bill continues the
exemption from public disclosure those records held by the department related to the operations
and processes of the department. The exemptions are necessary to protect the security and
integrity of lottery operations and to allow the department to participate in multistate lottery
games. Information held by the department is designated as confidential and exempt but may be
disclosed to other governmental entities in the performance of their duties.
The exemptions are subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act (OGSR) and will stand
repealed on October 2, 2024, unless reenacted by the Legislature. The bill removes the scheduled
repeal of the exemption to continue the confidential and exempt status of the information.
However, public records exemptions relating to the Lottery cybersecurity will be subject to a
new repeal date of October 2, 2027. This will correspond with the repeal date for the review and
repeal date for the general cybersecurity exemptions under chapter 119.
The bill is not expected to impact state or local government revenues and expenditures.
The bill takes effect October 1, 2024.
BILL: CS/SB 7008 Page 2
II. Present Situation:
Access to Public Records - Generally
The State Constitution provides that the public has the right to inspect or copy records made or
received in connection with official governmental business.1 The right to inspect or copy applies
to the official business of any public body, officer, or employee of the state, including all three
branches of state government, local governmental entities, and any person acting on behalf of the
government.2
Additional requirements and exemptions related to public records are found in various statutes
and rules, depending on the branch of government involved. For instance, s. 11.0431, F.S.,
provides public access requirements for legislative records. Relevant exemptions are codified in
s. 11.0431(2)-(3), F.S., and adopted in the rules of each house of the legislature.3 Florida Rule of
Judicial Administration 2.420 governs public access to judicial branch records.4 Lastly, ch. 119,
F.S., known as the Public Records Act, provides requirements for public records held by
executive agencies.
Executive Agency Records – The Public Records Act
The Public Records Act provides that all state, county and municipal records are open for
personal inspection and copying by any person, and that providing access to public records is a
duty of each agency.5
Section 119.011(12), F.S., defines “public records” to include:
all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound
recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical
form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law
or ordinance or in connections with the transaction of official business by any
agency.
The Florida Supreme Court has interpreted this definition to encompass all materials made or
received by an agency in connection with official business that are used to “perpetuate,
communicate, or formalize knowledge of some type.”6
1
FLA. CONST. art. I, s. 24(a).
2
Id. See also, Sarasota Citizens for Responsible Gov’t v. City of Sarasota, 48 So. 3d 755, 762-763 (Fla. 2010).
3
See Rule 1.48, Rules and Manual of the Florida Senate, (2022-2024) and Rule 14.1, Rules of the Florida House of
Representatives, Edition 2, (2022-2024).
4
State v. Wooten, 260 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
5
Section 119.01(1), F.S. Section 119.011(2), F.S., defines “agency” as “any state, county, district, authority, or municipal
officer, department, division, board, bureau, commission, or other separate unit of government created or established by law
including, for the purposes of this chapter, the Commission on Ethics, the Public Service Commission, and the Office of
Public Counsel, and any other public or private agency, person, partnership, corporation, or business entity acting on behalf
of any public agency.”
6
Shevin v. Byron, Harless, Schaffer, Reid and Assoc., Inc., 379 So. 2d 633, 640 (Fla. 1980).
BILL: CS/SB 7008 Page 3
The Florida Statutes specify conditions under which public access to public records must be
provided. The Public Records Act guarantees every person’s right to inspect and copy any public
record at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the
custodian of the public record.7 A violation of the Public Records Act may result in civil or
criminal liability.8
The Legislature may exempt public records from public access requirements by passing a
general law by a two-thirds vote of both the House and the Senate.9 The exemption must state
with specificity the public necessity justifying the exemption and must be no broader than
necessary to accomplish the stated purpose of the exemption.10
General exemptions from the public records requirements are contained in the Public Records
Act.11 Specific exemptions often are placed in the substantive statutes relating to a particular
agency or program.12
When creating a public records exemption, the Legislature may provide that a record is “exempt”
or “confidential and exempt.” There is a difference between records the Legislature has
determined to be exempt from the Public Records Act and those which the Legislature has
determined to be exempt from the Public Records Act and confidential.13 Records designated as
“confidential and exempt” are not subject to inspection by the public and may only be released
under the circumstances defined by statute.14 Records designated as “exempt” may be released at
the discretion of the records custodian under certain circumstances.15
Open Government Sunset Review Act
The provisions of s. 119.15, F.S., known as the Open Government Sunset Review Act16 (the
Act), prescribe a legislative review process for newly created or substantially amended 17 public
records or open meetings exemptions, with specified exceptions.18 The Act requires the repeal of
7
Section 119.07(1)(a), F.S.
8
Section 119.10, F.S. Public records laws are found throughout the Florida Statutes, as are the penalties for violating those
laws.
9
FLA. CONST. art. I, s. 24(c).
10
Id. See, e.g., Halifax Hosp. Medical Center v. News-Journal Corp., 724 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1999) (holding that a public
meetings exemption was unconstitutional because the statement of public necessity did not define important terms and did
not justify the breadth of the exemption); Baker County Press, Inc. v. Baker County Medical Services, Inc., 870 So. 2d 189
(Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding that a statutory provision written to bring another party within an existing public records
exemption is unconstitutional without a public necessity statement).
11
See, e.g., s. 119.071(1)(a), F.S. (exempting from public disclosure examination questions and answer sheets of
examinations administered by a governmental agency for the purpose of licensure).
12
See, e.g., s. 213.053(2)(a), F.S. (exempting from public disclosure information contained in tax returns received by the
Department of Revenue).
13
WFTV, Inc. v. The Sch. Bd. of Seminole County, 874 So. 2d 48, 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
14
Id.
15
Williams v. City of Minneola, 575 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
16
Section 119.15, F.S.
17
An exemption is considered to be substantially amended if it is expanded to include more records or information or to
include meetings as well as records. Section 119.15(4)(b), F.S.
18
Section 119.15(2)(a) and (b), F.S., provides that exemptions required by federal law or applicable solely to the Legislature
or the State Court System are not subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act.
BILL: CS/SB 7008 Page 4
such exemption on October 2 of the fifth year after its creation or substantial amendment, unless
the Legislature reenacts the exemption.19
The Act provides that a public records or open meetings exemption may be created or
maintained only if it serves an identifiable public purpose and is no broader than is necessary.20
An exemption serves an identifiable purpose if the Legislature finds that the purpose of the
exemption outweighs open government policy and cannot be accomplished without the
exemption and it meets one of the following purposes:
 It allows the state or its political subdivisions to effectively and efficiently administer a
governmental program, and administration would be significantly impaired without the
exemption;21
 It protects sensitive, personal information, the release of which would be defamatory, cause
unwarranted damage to the good name or reputation of the individual, or would jeopardize
the individual’s safety. If this public purpose is cited as the basis of an exemption, however,
only personal identifying information is exempt;22 or
 It protects information of a confidential nature concerning entities, such as trade or business
secrets.23
The Act also requires specified questions to be considered during the review process.24 In
examining an exemption, the Act directs the Legislature to question the purpose and necessity of
reenacting the exemption.
If the exemption is continued and expanded, then a public necessity statement and a two-thirds
vote for passage are again required.25 If the exemption is continued without substantive changes
or if the exemption is continued and narrowed, then a public necessity statement and a two-thirds
vote for passage are not required. If the Legislature allows an exemption to expire, the previously
exempt records will remain exempt unless otherwise provided by law.26
19
Section 119.15(3), F.S.
20
Section 119.15(6)(b), F.S.
21
Section 119.15(6)(b)1., F.S.
22
Section 119.15(6)(b)2., F.S.
23
Section 119.15(6)(b)3., F.S.
24
Section 119.15(6)(a), F.S. The specified questions are:
 What specific records or meetings are affected by the exemption?
 Whom does the exemption uniquely affect, as opposed to the general public?
 What is the identifiable public purpose or goal of the exemption?
 Can the information contained in the records or discussed in the meeting be readily obtained by alternative means?
If so, how?
 Is the record or meeting protected by another exemption?
 Are there multiple exemptions for the same type of record or meeting that it would be appropriate to merge?
25
See generally s. 119.15, F.S.
26
Section 119.15(7), F.S.
BILL: CS/SB 7008 Page 5
Department of the Lottery
In general, lotteries are illegal in Florida.27 However, article X, section 15 of the State
Constitution allows lotteries to be operated by the state. Section 24.102(2), F.S., provides the
intent of the Legislature that:
 The net proceeds of lottery games shall be used to support improvements in public education;
 Lottery operations shall be undertaken as an entrepreneurial business enterprise; and
 The department shall be accountable through audits, financial disclosure, open meetings, and
public records laws.
The department operates the Florida Lottery to maximize revenues “consonant with the dignity
of the state and the welfare of its citizens”28 for the benefit of public education.29
Prior to 2019, s. 24.105(12), F.S., authorized the department to determine by rule the information
relating to the operation of the lottery to be confidential and exempt from the provisions of
s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution, if necessary to the security and integrity
of the lottery. Such information included trade secrets; security measures and reports; bid and
contractual information that, if disclosed, would impair the department to contract for goods or
services on favorable terms; and personnel information unrelated to compensation, duties,
qualifications, or responsibilities. Confidential information was authorized to be released to other
governmental entities as needed in connection with the performance of their duties, but the
recipient was required to retain the confidentiality of the information provided.
Section 24.1051, F.S., enacted in 2019,30 codified, clarified, and exempted the following
information held by the department from inspection or copying of public records:
 Information that, if released, could harm the security or integrity of the department, including
information:
o Relating to the security of the department’s technologies, processes, and practices to
protect networks, computers, data processing, software, data, and data systems from
attack, damage, or unauthorized access;
o Relating to security information and measures of the department, whether physical or
virtual;
o About lottery games, promotions, tickets, and ticket stocks, such as description, design,
production, printing, packaging, shipping, delivery, storage, and validation processes; and
o Concerning terminals, machines, and devices that issue tickets;
 Information required to be maintained as confidential in order for the department to
participate in multistate lottery associations or games;
 Personal identifying information obtained by the department when processing background
investigations of current or potential retailers or vendors; and
27
See FLA. CONST. art. X, s. 7, and s. 849.09, F.S.
28
See s. 24.104, F.S.
29
See s. 24.121(2), F.S.
30
See ch. 2019-41, Laws of Fla.
BILL: CS/SB 7008 Page 6
 Financial information about a vendor or lottery ticket retailer which is not publicly available
and is provided for review of the entity’s financial responsibility,31 provided that the entity
marks such information as confidential. However, financial information related to any
contract, agreement, or addendum with the department, including the amount of money paid,
any payment structure or plan, expenditures, incentives, bonuses, fees, and penalties, is
public record.
Penalties for the improper disclosure of lottery information that is designated as confidential and
exempt are addressed in s. 24.1051(5), F.S. A person who, with intent to defraud or to provide a
financial or other advantage to himself, herself, or another, knowingly and willfully discloses
such confidential and exempt information, commits a felony of the first degree.32
Cybersecurity Public Record and Public Meeting Exemptions
In 2022, the Legislature enacted s. 119.0725(3), F.S., to create a new public records exemption,
applicable to all agencies,33 for certain information relating to cybersecurity. Specifically, the
following information is made confidential and exempt from public inspection and copying
requirements:
 Coverage limits and deductible or self-insurance amounts of insurance or other risk
mitigation coverages acquired for the protection of information technology systems,
operational technology systems, or data of an agency.
 Information related to critical infrastructure.34
 Cybersecurity incident information contained in certain reports.
 Network schematics, hardware and software configurations, or encryption information or
information that identifies