The Florida Senate
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.)
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules
BILL: CS/SB 720
INTRODUCER: Judiciary Committee and Senator Hutson
SUBJECT: Asbestos and Silica Claims
DATE: February 20, 2024 REVISED:
ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION
1. Bond Cibula JU Fav/CS
2. Bond Twogood RC Favorable
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes
I. Summary:
CS/SB 720 increases the information required to be included in the initial pleading filed by a
plaintiff alleging injury from exposure to asbestos or silica. Current law requires specific
information regarding the claim and the claimant; the bill adds the requirement to disclose more.
The bill adds: the exposed person’s smoking history, the name and address of persons
knowledgeable about the exposure, and the occupation and employer of any person by which the
exposed person alleges the exposure occurred where the exposure was other than direct or
bystander exposure. The evidence supporting each claim against each defendant must be
specified. The bill makes clear that failure to link a defendant to a specific exposure, or to furnish
the required information, is grounds for dismissal of the defendant or the case, as appropriate.
The bill is effective July 1, 2024.
II. Present Situation:
In 2005, the Legislature enacted the “Asbestos and Silica Compensation Fairness Act.”1 The
purposes of the act are to:
Give priority to true victims of asbestos and silica claimants who can demonstrate actual
physical impairment caused by exposure to asbestos or silica;
Fully preserve the rights of claimants who were exposed to asbestos or silica to pursue
compensation if they become impaired in the future as a result of the exposure;
1
Section 774.201, F.S.
BILL: CS/SB 720 Page 2
Enhance the ability of the judicial system to supervise and control asbestos and silica
litigation; and
Conserve the scarce resources of the defendants to allow compensation to cancer victims and
others who are physically impaired by exposure to asbestos or silica while securing the right
to similar compensation for those who may suffer physical impairment in the future.2
The act accomplishes its purposes by prohibiting speculative claims and focusing on persons
who can demonstrate an actual physical impairment caused by asbestos.3 One means of doing so
is through requirements that the plaintiff provide detailed information regarding the claim at the
outset of the litigation.
In order to file a case governed by the act, the plaintiff must supply a number of facts regarding
the exposure to the asbestos and the resultant injuries. The complaint must include a written
report and supporting test results constituting prima facie evidence of the exposed person’s
asbestos-related or silica-related physical impairment.4 In addition to the written report, the
plaintiff must include with the complaint a sworn information form containing:
The claimant’s name, address, date of birth, and marital status;
If the claimant alleges exposure to asbestos or silica through the testimony of another person
or alleges other than direct or bystander exposure to a product, the name, address, date of
birth, and marital status for each person by which the claimant alleges exposure, hereinafter
the “index person,” and the claimant’s relationship to each such person;
The specific location of each alleged exposure;
The beginning and ending dates of each alleged exposure as to each asbestos product or silica
product for each location at which exposure allegedly took place for the plaintiff and each
index person;
The occupation and name of the employer of the exposed person at the time of each alleged
exposure;
The specific condition related to asbestos or silica claimed to exist; and
Any supporting documentation of the condition claimed to exist.
The statute does not specify what a trial court should do if the plaintiff fails to comply with the
pleading requirements. Thus, the general Florida Civil Rules of Procedure govern the court's
response to a failure to comply with the statutory pleading requirements. In general, case law
interpreting the rules of procedure requires a trial court to give the Plaintiff at least one chance to
amend the complaint before dismissing the lawsuit.
III. Effect of Proposed Changes:
CS/SB 720 changes the term “claimant” to the more accurate “exposed person” and changes the
pleading requirements for a claim alleging injury from exposure to asbestos or silica to add:
A requirement that the sworn information form specify the evidence that supports each claim
against each defendant.
2
Section 774.202, F.S.
3
Section 774.204(1), F.S.
4
Section 774.205(2), F.S. The proof must meet the requirements of s. 774.204(2), (3), (5), or (6), F.S. The details of such
proof are not relevant to this analysis.
BILL: CS/SB 720 Page 3
A requirement to disclose the exposed person’s smoking history.
A requirement to disclose the name and address of each person who is knowledgeable about
the exposed person’s exposure to asbestos or silica.
A requirement to list the occupation and employer of the index person related to the
exposure.
The bill provides that the sworn information form is inadmissible at the trial and may not be
relied upon by any witness.
A court must dismiss a defendant from the case if that defendant’s product or premises is not
specifically identified in the sworn information form. A court must dismiss the case as to a
specific defendant, or in its entirety for the benefit of all defendants, if the claimant fails to
comply with the pleading requirements of the section. Before filing a motion to dismiss, a
defendant must confer with, or reasonably attempt to confer with, the plaintiff regarding
dismissal or to have the plaintiff amend the sworn information form to comply with the
requirements of s. 774.205, F.S. A defendant’s motion to dismiss must certify that the defendant
conferred with, or made a reasonable attempt to confer with, the plaintiff.
The dismissal of a claim for the failure to provide the information required on the sworn
information form is without prejudice, meaning that the claim may be refiled with a properly
completed sworn information form.
The bill is effective July 1, 2024.
IV. Constitutional Issues:
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions:
None.
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues:
None.
C. Trust Funds Restrictions:
None.
D. State Tax or Fee Increases:
None.
E. Other Constitutional Issues:
None.
BILL: CS/SB 720 Page 4
V. Fiscal Impact Statement:
A. Tax/Fee Issues:
None.
B. Private Sector Impact:
The bill discourages the current practice of naming defendants in an asbestos or silica
lawsuit who have no link to the exposure that caused the injury. The bill may thereby
lower or eliminate some attorney's fees and costs currently being spent on defending
claims that are without merit.
C. Government Sector Impact:
The bill may reduce court expenditures to the extent that fewer parties are involved in
asbestos litigation.
VI. Technical Deficiencies:
None.
VII. Related Issues:
None.
VIII. Statutes Affected:
This bill substantially amends section 774.205 of the Florida Statutes.
IX. Additional Information:
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes:
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.)
CS by Judiciary on February 5, 2024:
The amendment removes from the bill a requirement to disclose the specific product
related to an exposure. The amendment also adds that the sworn information form may
not be relied upon by any witness at trial.
B. Amendments:
None.
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.
Statutes affected: S 720 Filed: 774.205
S 720 c1: 774.205
S 720 e1: 774.205