The Florida Senate
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.)
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules
BILL: CS/CS/SB 846
INTRODUCER: Rules Committee; Judiciary Committee; and Senator Avila
SUBJECT: Agreements of Educational Entities with Foreign Entities
DATE: April 11, 2023 REVISED:
ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION
1. Jahnke Bouck HE Favorable
2. Collazo Cibula JU Fav/CS
3. Jahnke Twogood RC Fav/CS
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes
I. Summary:
CS/CS/SB 846 establishes requirements specific to State University System (i.e. state
universities) and Florida College System (i.e. state colleges) institutions with respect to receiving
foreign gifts and entering into international cultural agreements.
The bill prohibits state universities, state colleges, and their employees and representatives, from
soliciting or accepting any gift in their official capacities from a college or university based in a
foreign country of concern, or from a foreign principal.
It also prohibits state universities and colleges from accepting any grant from or participating in
any agreement or partnership with any college or university based in a foreign country of
concern, or with any foreign principal. A state university or college may only participate in a
partnership or agreement with a college or university based in a foreign country of concern, or
with a foreign principal, if authorized by the Board of Governors or the State Board of
Education, respectively, and if the agreement satisfies certain other criteria required of all state
agency cultural agreements.
The bill also:
 Authorizes the Board of Governors or the State Board of Education to impose statutory
sanctions on, and withhold performance funding from, state universities or colleges for
unapproved partnerships or agreements.
BILL: CS/CS/SB 846 Page 2
 Requires the submittal of reports to the Governor and the Legislature, annually by December
1, which include data on grants, agreements, partnerships, or contracts with any foreign
entity.
Lastly, the bill prohibits the ownership or operation of any private school participating in the
state’s school choice scholarship program, by a person or entity domiciled in, owned by, or in
any way controlled by a foreign country of concern or a foreign principal.
The bill takes effect on July 1, 2023.
II. Present Situation:
The State University System and the Board of Governors
The State University System is composed of 12 public universities.1 Each constituent university
is administered by a board of trustees.
The Board of Governors (BOG) is responsible for operating, regulating, controlling, and being
fully responsible for the management of the whole State University System.2 It is also
responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws governing
the institutions under its jurisdiction.3
If the BOG determines that one of its institutions is not complying with a law or regulation, it
may initiate a number of disciplinary actions including withholding of state or other funds,
requiring periodic reporting until the institution is in compliance, or reporting noncompliance to
the Legislature.4
Established in 2007, the BOG Office of the Inspector General and Director of Compliance
provides leadership and coordination of audit, investigative, and compliance activities for the
BOG and generally promotes activities that ensure accountability, financial integrity, and
efficiency as required by law.5
The Florida College System and the State Board of Education
Except for the State University System, the State Board of Education (SBE) is the chief
implementing and coordinating body of public education in Florida.6 It is responsible for
overseeing the performance of early learning coalitions, district school boards, and Florida
College System institution boards of trustees in connection with the enforcement of all laws and
rules.7
1
See State University System of Florida, Universities, https://www.flbog.edu/universities/ (last visited Mar. 17, 2023)
(identifying 12 state universities).
2
FLA. CONST., art. IX, s. 7(a)-(d).
3
Section 1001.705(2), F.S.
4
See generally s. 1008.322(5), F.S.
5
State University System of Florida, Inspector General, https://www.flbog.edu/about-us/inspector-general/ (last visited Mar.
17, 2023).
6
Section 1001.02(1), F.S.; FLA. CONST., art. IX, s. 2.
7
Section 1008.32, F.S.
BILL: CS/CS/SB 846 Page 3
If the SBE determines that a Florida College System institution is not complying with a law or
regulation, it may initiate a number of disciplinary actions including the withholding of state or
other funds, requiring periodic reporting until the institution is in compliance, or reporting
noncompliance to the Legislature.8
Research and Development
Expenditures
In 2020-2021, research and development expenditures for all U.S. colleges and universities was
almost $90 billion.9 In that same year, total research and development expenditures by state
universities in Florida was approximately $2.3 billion.10
Review by the Select Committee on the Integrity of Research Institutions
In 2020, the Florida House of Representatives Select Committee on the Integrity of Research
Institutions (Select Committee) undertook an extensive review of Florida’s university-based
research programs. This investigation arose out of revelations that the CEO of H. Lee Moffitt
Cancer Center and Research Institute and three other officers or research scientists had failed to
disclose support from relationships with Chinese talent and research programs. Following that
disclosure, the University of Florida disclosed to the Select Committee that three of its research
staff were under similar investigations.11
In March 2021, Governor Ron DeSantis and members of the Florida House and Senate
highlighted proposed legislation to combat foreign influence, in response to the Communist
Party of China’s deliberate attempts to economically infiltrate the U.S. Among the purposes of
the proposed legislation was to place strategic safeguards against foreign influence by
strengthening institutional vetting and applying protections for Florida’s institutions of higher
education, public entities, and recipients of public grants or contracts.12 The Select Committee
found that Florida state research grants lacked certain requirements deemed reasonably necessary
to ensure research integrity.13
8
See generally s. 1008.32(4), F.S.
9
National Science Foundation, Ranking by total R&D expenditures, https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?method=
rankingbysource&ds=herd (last visited March 17, 2023).
10
Board of Governors, State University System Research: Presentation to the Florida Senate Committee on Education
Postsecondary, at 41:23 (Jan. 18, 2023), https://www.flsenate.gov/media/videoplayer?EventID=1_zc8d1g0v-
202301181000&Redirect=true.
11
Florida House of Representatives, Public Integrity & Elections Committee, Meeting Packet, at 2 (March 4, 2020),
available at https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?PublicationType=Committees&Committee
Id=3104&Session=2021&DocumentType=Meeting%20Packets&FileName=pie%203-4-21.pdf.
12
Press Release, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Governor Ron DeSantis and House Speaker Chris Sprowls Highlight
Proposed Legislation to Combat Foreign Influence and Corporate Espionage (March 1, 2021),
https://www.flgov.com/2021/03/01/governor-ron-desantis-and-house-speaker-chris-sprowls-highlight-proposed-legislation-
to-combat-foreign-influence-and-corporate-espionage/.
13
Florida House of Representatives, Public Integrity & Elections Committee, supra note 11, at 2.
BILL: CS/CS/SB 846 Page 4
As part of its investigation, the Select Committee reviewed studies indicating that all of the
following activities, because they project foreign interests into domestic affairs, are means to
influence domestic policy, advance hostile foreign interests, and limit academic freedom:
 Sister cities programs.
 Academic language and culture centers.
 Foreign funding of domestic institutions.
 Foreign-influenced employment of domestic scientists and engineers.14
Disclosure of Foreign Gifts
At the federal level, colleges and universities in the U.S. which receive contracts and gifts from a
foreign source worth $250,000 or more within a calendar year, must file disclosure reports with
the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education. Such reports must be filed twice a year.15
At the state level, any agency16 that receives, directly or indirectly, any gift or grant with a value
of $50,000 or more from any foreign source must disclose the gift or grant to the Department of
Financial Services (DFS) within 30 days after receiving the gift or grant. The disclosure must
include the date and amount of the gift or grant, as well as the name and country of residence or
domicile of the foreign source.17 Violations of this disclosure requirement could result in
financial penalties: $5,000 for a first violation and $10,000 for any subsequent violation. A third
or subsequent violation could result in the person responsible for accepting the undisclosed grant
or gift being removed from office or a determination that the agency is ineligible for any grants
or contracts.18
Additionally, any institution of higher education (IHE)19 and its affiliate organizations must
report, on a semiannual basis, any gift received, directly or indirectly, from a foreign source
having a value of $50,000 or more during the fiscal year to either the BOG (for a state
university) or the SBE (for all other institutions).20 Such reporting substitutes for the DFS
reporting requirement. The IHE’s report must include the amount of the gift and the date
received, the contract start and end date if applicable, the name of the foreign source, and a copy
of the gift agreement.21
Beginning July 1, 2022, the Inspector General of the BOG or the Inspector General of the
Department of Education, as applicable, must randomly inspect or audit, on an annual basis, at
least 5 percent of the total number of gifts disclosed by or gift agreements received from IHEs
14
Id.
15
20 U.S.C. s. 1011f(a).
16
“State agency” means any agency or unit of state government created or established by law. Section 286.101(1)(h), F.S.
17
Section 286.101(2), F.S.
18
Section 286.101(7), F.S.
19
An “institution of higher education” is a state university and an affiliated institute with its own governing board, a Florida
College System institution, an independent nonprofit college or university that is located in and chartered by the state and
grants baccalaureate or higher degrees, any other institution that has a physical presence in the state and is required to report
foreign gifts or contracts under federal law, or an affiliate organization of an institution of higher education. Section
1010.25(1)(g), F.S.
20
Section 1010.25(2), F.S.
21
Section 1010.25(3), F.S.
BILL: CS/CS/SB 846 Page 5
during the previous year to determine an institution’s compliance with the reporting
requirements.22
An IHE that knowingly or negligently fails to disclose a specified gift is subject to a civil penalty
of 105 percent of the amount of the undisclosed gift, payable only from the non-state funds of the
IHE or the affiliated organization that received the gift. The BOG or SBE may enforce the
penalty. Absent BOG or SBE enforcement, the Attorney General or the Chief Financial Officer
may bring a civil action to enforce the penalty.23
The BOG Office of Inspector General and Director of Compliance, in its annual report, reported
receipt of a total of 689 foreign gift disclosures from eight state universities for the 2020-2021
fiscal year. The total amount of the foreign gifts was approximately $116.6 million.24 Of these
gifts, 579 were contracts, 26 were gifts, and 84 were student sponsorships. Twenty-one of the
foreign gifts were from foreign countries of concern:25 China (19) and Russia (2).26 The
Inspector General and Director of Compliance reported that all foreign gift disclosures were
made in a timely manner in the prescribed method.27
International Cultural Agreements
State law provides for the coordination of certain international relationships, including those
between sister states and sister cities. Florida’s economic development programs emphasize
commerce with foreign jurisdictions.28 However, such agreements could result in the imposition
of foreign competitors’ public policy preferences upon local U.S. governments; for example, it
has been reported that China contractually requires its sister cities to acknowledge and commit to
its “One China” policy.29
Under state law, a state agency, political subdivision, public school, state college, or state
university authorized to expend state-appropriated funds or levy ad valorem taxes may not
participate in any agreement with, or accept any grant from, a foreign country of concern or any
entity controlled by a foreign country of concern, which:
 Constrains the freedom of contract of the public entity;
 Allows the curriculum or values of a program in the state to be directed or controlled by the
foreign country of concern; or
22
Section 1010.25(3)(d)2., F.S.
23
Section 1010.25(5), F.S.
24
Board of Governors, Office of Inspector General and Director of Compliance, Compliance Review: Foreign Gifts
Inspection, at 3 (Dec. 15, 2022) (on file with the Committee on Education Postsecondary).
25
“Foreign country of concern” means the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran,
the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, the Venezuelan regime of Nicolás Maduro, or the Syrian
Arab Republic, including any agency of or any other entity under significant control of such foreign country of concern.
Section 286.101(1)(b), F.S.
26
Board of Governors, Office of Inspector General and Director of Compliance, supra note 24, at 7.
27
Id. at 9.
28
See generally ss. 288.816 and 288.826, F.S.
29
See Matej Šimalčík and Adam Kalivoda, Sister-City Relations and Identity Politics: The Case of Prague, Beijing, Taipei,
and Shanghai, THE DIPLOMAT, Feb. 25, 2020, available at https://thediplomat.com/2020/02/sister-city-relations-and-identity-
politics-the-case-of-prague-beijing-taipei-and-shanghai/.
BILL: CS/CS/SB 846 Page 6
 Promotes an agenda detrimental to the safety or security of the U.S. or its residents.30
Additionally, for the 2022-2023 fiscal year, a state agency, political subdivision, public school,
state college, or state university may not enter into any agreement with, or accept any grant from,
the Russian Federation, although this prohibition is currently set to expire on July 1, 2023.31
At the federal level, before executing any cultural exchange agreement with a foreign country of
concern, the substance of the agreement must be shared with federal agencies that are tasked
with protecting national security and enforcing trade sanctions, embargoes, or other restrictions
under federal law. If one such federal agency provides information suggesting that the agreement
promotes an agenda detrimental to the safety or security of the U.S. or its residents, the public
entity may not enter into the agreement.32
A state agency, political subdivision, public school, state college, or state university may not
accept anything of value conditioned upon participation in a program or other endeavor to
promote the language or culture of a foreign country of concern.33
III. Effect of Proposed Changes:
CS/CS/SB 846 establishes requirements specific to state universities and Florida College System
institutions (state colleges) related to the receipt of foreign gifts and international cultural
agreements.
Foreign Gifts
The bill amends s. 286.101, F.S., to remove state universities34 and state colleges35 from the
definition of a “state agency” for the purposes of foreign gift disclos