ENROLLED ORIGINAL
A RESOLUTION
25-549
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
June 25, 2024
To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to extend amendments to the
Universal Paid Leave Amendment Act of 2016 to prohibit the reduction of private market
short-term disability benefits based on actual or estimated paid leave benefits to which an
eligible individual may be entitled to from the District, regardless of in which jurisdiction
the policy was issued or written; and to extend amendments to Title I of the Insurance
Trade and Economic Development Amendment Act of 2000 to make the prohibition of
offsetting or reducing benefits under a private market short-term disability insurance
policy based on estimated or actual benefits received under the Universal Paid Leave
Amendment Act of 2016 enforceable under that law, regardless of the jurisdiction in
which the insurance policy was issued or written.
RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this
resolution may be cited as the “Short-Term Disability Insurance Benefit Protection Clarification
Emergency Declaration Resolution of 2024”.
Sec. 2. (a) There exists an immediate need to extend the Short-Term Disability Insurance
Benefit Protection Clarification Temporary Amendment Act of 2023, effective November 28,
2023 (D.C. Law 25-83; 70 DCR 13760), expiring July 10, 2024, to protect benefits from the
District’s Universal Paid Leave program and benefit payments from short-term disability
insurance plans for District workers who are entitled to both.
(b) Many District employers provide optional, private short-term disability insurance
plans as part of the compensation package paid and available to employees. These plans provide
enrolled employees with partial income replacement for the employee’s absence from work due
to recovery from injury or illness, including postpartum recovery. A typical short-term disability
plan provides between 40% and 60% of the employee’s salary up to a duration of between 3 to 6
months based on documented medical need. Some employers pay the premiums for these plans,
while many employers require employees to pay all or part of the premiums.
(c) The District’s Universal Paid Leave (“UPL”) program launched in July 2020. It
provides benefits, in the form of partial wage replacement, to District workers who need to take
time off from work for events associated with the birth or adoption of a new child, including
1
 ENROLLED ORIGINAL
bonding (“parental leave”), recovery from serious illness or injury (“medical leave”), or caring
for a family member with a serious illness or injury (“family leave”). District employers pay
quarterly contributions into a social insurance fund from which benefits are paid to eligible
workers when a qualifying leave event arises.
(d) The UPL program provides up to 12 total weeks of benefits for parental leave,
medical leave, and family leave.
(e) Many District workers use the public and private programs together, relying on them
to achieve closer to full wage replacement in total and to extend the period of wage replacement
to more fully cover unpaid periods of leave from work necessitated by sometimes complex and
lengthy medical needs.
(f) In 2021, the Council learned that, since the UPL program began paying benefits to
workers, private insurance companies providing coverage to District workers were offsetting the
amount of benefits paid under their short-term disability plans by the amount of benefits the
employee was expected to receive from the District’s UPL program regardless of whether the
beneficiary had applied for or received those paid leave benefits or not and regardless of the
purpose for which the leave was used (i.e., parental bonding leave rather than medical leave).
(g) In the last Council period, the Committee on Labor and Workforce Development
(“Labor Committee”) worked to partially close this coordination of benefits loophole to prohibit
benefit offsetting by including amendments to the Universal Paid Leave Amendment Act of
2016, effective April 7, 2017 (D.C. Law 21-264; D.C. Official Code § 32-541.01 et seq.), in the
Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Support Act of 2021, effective November 13, 2021 (D.C. Law 24-45;
68 DCR 10163).
(h) It later came to the attention of the Labor Committee that the Department of
Insurance, Securities, and Banking’s (“DISB”) ability to enforce the anti-offsetting law, as
intended, was hampered by the fact that the agency’s enforcement authority is typically limited
to insurance policies that were written or issued in the District. Thus, DISB was likely unable to
take enforcement action against an insurer for unlawfully offsetting UPL benefits for District-
based employees because the employer’s short-term disability policy was written or delivered
outside the District.
(i) Some employers of District employees—such as national employers or those based in
other states—may purchase a policy that was written or delivered outside the District. It was
previously reported to the Labor Committee that several insurance companies do not believe
their short-term disability benefit is protected by the District’s anti-offsetting provision and
Council offices continue to hear reports of District workers being victims of offsetting practices.
(j) The Council did not intend for UPL benefits to reduce or limit workers’ access to
short-term disability benefits as:
(1) The UPL law states that the right to UPL benefits is not to be diminished by a
collective bargaining agreement, by any other contract, or by an employer policy;
2
 ENROLLED ORIGINAL
(2) The law enumerates 2 programs, unemployment insurance and long-term
disability insurance, that, if an individual is receiving benefits under those programs, will make
the individual ineligible for UPL benefits, implying that individuals are permitted to receive
benefits under other programs, such as short-term disability;
(3) The law states that the UPL benefits shall not prevent an employer from
supplementing or providing greater benefits than required under the UPL law;
(4) Individual workers often use the programs for different purposes, such as UPL
for bonding leave and short-term disability for postpartum recovery, which are subject to
different time restrictions; and
(5) The UPL program and short-term disability insurance have completely
separate and independent funding mechanisms.
(k) Under the UPL law, it is unlawful for any person to interfere with an employee’s right
to UPL. Using the UPL benefits as an offset for short-term disability benefits renders the UPL
benefit meaningless because an employee receives no more benefit than they would in the
absence of UPL; that is interference.
(l) The intent of this legislation is to continue to strengthen DISB’s enforcement authority
to prevent interference by including an extraterritoriality clause that requires application of the
law regardless of the jurisdiction in which the private market short-term disability insurance
policy was written or issued.
(m) The Council initially passed emergency legislation to safeguard the benefits of
District workers on July 11, 2022, and the corresponding temporary legislation went into effect
December 23, 2022, and the legislation was renewed in a second round of emergency and
temporary legislation that went into effect on July 26, 2023, and November 28, 2023,
respectively. The temporary measure will expire July 10, 2024, and action must be taken to enact
a new round of legislation while passage of the permanent bill is pending in the current Council
period.
Sec. 3. The Council determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute
emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Short-Term Disability Insurance Benefit
Protection Clarification Emergency Amendment Act of 2024 be adopted after a single reading.
Sec. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
3