MURIEL BOWSER
MAYOR
June 18, 2024
Honorable Phil Mendelson
Chairman
Council of the District of Columbia
John A. Wilson Building
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 504
Washington, DC 20004
Dear Chairman Mendelson:
Pursuant to section 451 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (D.C. Official Code § 1-
204.51) and section 202 of the Procurement Practices Reform Act of 2010 (D.C. Official Code §
2-352.02), enclosed for consideration and approval by the Council of the District of Columbia is
proposed Contract No. DCAM-22-CS-RFQ-0016L with HRGM Corporation in the not-to-exceed
amount of $10,000,000. The contract’s period of performance is one year from the date of the
award.
Under the proposed contract, HRGM Corporation will provide maintenance and repair services
projects for District of Columbia Public Schools and Department of Parks and Recreation facilities,
as awarded through task order agreements, at various District government facilities under its
contract with the Department of General Services (“DGS”).
My administration is available to discuss any questions you may have regarding the proposed
contract. To facilitate a response to any questions you may have, please contact Delano Hunter,
Director, DGS, or George G. Lewis, Chief of Contracts and Procurement, DGS, at (202) 727-2800.
I look forward to the Council’s favorable consideration of this contract.
Sincerely,
Muriel Bowser
 GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
Pursuant to Section 202(c) of the Procurement Practices Reform Act of 2010, as amended,
D.C. Official Code § 2-352.02(c), the following contract summary is provided:
COUNCIL CONTRACT SUMMARY
(Standard and multiyear)
Contract for Maintenance & Repairs of Government Facilities (“MRGF”) Services
(A) Contract Number: DCAM-22-CS-RFQ-0016L
Proposed Contractor: HRGM Corporation
Proposed Guaranteed Minimum
Value (Per Base and Option Year): $50
Proposed Contract Not to Exceed
(“NTE”) Amount (Per Base and
Option Year): $10,000,000
Unit and Method of Compensation: Monthly progress payments based on lump sum
pricing pursuant to competitively-awarded task order
agreements
Term of Contract: From the date of execution of the Contract (Basic
Ordering Agreement (“BOA”)) by the Department
through 1 year thereafter (“Base Year”)
Type of Contract: Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”)
Source Selection Method: Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”)
(B) For a contract containing option periods, the contract amount for the base period and for
each option period. If the contract amount for one or more of the option periods differs from
the amount for the base period, provide an explanation of the reason for the difference:
For the Base Year and each Option Year:
1
 Base Year
Guaranteed Minimum Value: $50
Maximum NTE Amount: $10,000,000
Option Year 1
Guaranteed Minimum Value: $50
Maximum NTE Amount: $10,000,000
Option Year 2
Guaranteed Minimum Value: $50
Maximum NTE Amount: $10,000,000
Option Year 3
Guaranteed Minimum Value: $50
Maximum NTE Amount: $10,000,000
Option Year 4
Guaranteed Minimum Value: $50
Maximum NTE Amount: $10,000,000
(C) The goods or services to be provided, the methods of delivering goods or services, and any
significant program changes reflected in the proposed contract:
Under the proposed contract DCAM-22-CS-RFQ-0016L for Maintenance and Repairs of
Government Facilities (“MRGF”) HRGM Corporation (the “Contractor”) will provide
maintenance and repair services projects for District of Columbia Facility Management Division,
District of Columbia Public Schools, and Department of Parks and Recreation facilities within the
Department of General services’ (“DGS”) real estate portfolio as competitively awarded via Task
Order Agreements (the “Project”).
In general, this work includes general construction and facility maintenance projects, including
but not limited to minor repairs, roofing repairs, window and door replacement, interior
demolition, playground renovations, and other miscellaneous work as may be necessary. The work
shall be performed on an as-needed basis. The work may also include, from time to time, small
construction projects that need to be completed quickly; these projects would primarily be in
response to emergency situations such as vandalism, structural failures, or other life safety issues.
The proposed Contract does not authorize any specific work by the Contractor. All work will be
awarded and released on a competitive basis through individual project task order agreements, as
set forth in the Contract. Since the aggregate NTE amount of the proposed Contract for the Base
Year and each of the four (4) one-year Option Years exceeds $1 million, Council approval is
required for this contract action.
(D) The selection process, including the number of offerors, the evaluation criteria, and the
evaluation results, including price, technical or quality, and past performance components:
2
On September 28, 2022, DGS issued a Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) to solicit Statements
of Qualifications (“SOQ(s)”) from those entities (“Offeror(s)”) interested in performing MRGF
for various District of Columbia owned properties within the DGS construction portfolio and
maintenance facility locations (“Project Locations”). In general, this work includes handling all
types of building and maintenance repairs and upgrades, including, but not limited to roofing and
plumbing repairs, electrical repairs, door and window replacements, carpentry, masonry, flooding
remediation, and fire alarm repairs, and other similar types of work and shall be performed on an
as-needed basis. The RFQ was posted on the DGS website.
A project information meeting was held on October 7, 2022, via Microsoft Teams. A total of three
(3) addenda were issued as follows:
Addendum No. 1, issued on October 3, 2022
 Corrected project information meeting time.
Addendum No. 2, issued on October 18, 2022
 Provided responses to the questions.
 Revised - Section E.4.1.5(ii) for Dun & Bradstreet report.
 Corrected - Section E.1 (SOQ Submission Identification).
 Revised – The last sentence in Section E.4.1.2 C (iv).
Addendum No. 3, issued on October 28, 2022
 Extended SOQ Submission Date to November 4, 2022, at 2:00 P.M.
Forty-six firms (collectively, the “Offerors” and each individually, an “Offeror”) submitted SOQs
in a timely manner by November 4, 2022, at 2:00 p.m., the SOQs’ due date.
Due to the number of SOQs received, the evaluation process has been broken into two (2) groups.
Each group of proposals was disbursed to the Technical Evaluation Panel (“TEP”) members with
evaluation score sheets specifically for each group. Four (4) technical categories were comprised
into a 100-point scale; in addition, Certified Business Enterprise Preference Points (up to 12 points)
were included as follows:
FACTORS WEIGHT
Past Performance, Experience & References 25 Points
Key Personnel 25 Points
Project Management Plan 25 Points
Capacity 25 Points
Certified Business Enterprise (“CBE”) Preference 12 Points
TOTAL 112 Points
The groups were prioritized by the needs of the District. The TEP Members met to discuss their
respective technical scores for each Offeror within each Group. The TEP Members completed
individual evaluations of SOQs. The TEP members discussed details of each SOQ, in addition to
evaluation factors and sub-factors as consensus scores were developed. Offerors that scored 85
points or higher from each group were selected as qualified contractors for the award. The
3
 Contracting Officer reviewed TEP’s technical scoring, and the SOQs submitted and determined
that eighteen (18) contractors out of thirty-five (35) in Group 2 of 2, including HRGM Corporation,
were selected for award of the proposed BOAs.
(E) A description of any bid protest related to the award of the contract, including whether the
protest was resolved through litigation, withdrawal of the protest by the protestor, or
voluntary corrective action by the District. Include the identity of the protestor, the grounds
alleged in the protest, and any deficiencies identified by the District as a result of the protest:
The Contract award was not protested.
(F) The background and qualifications of the proposed contractor, including its organization,
financial stability, personnel, and performance on past or current government or private
sector contracts with requirements similar to those of the proposed contract:
The Contractor is a general contractor located at 1807 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE,
Washington, DC 20020. The Contractor is a Certified Business Enterprise (“CBE”) firm and has
been in business for 45 years. The Contractor specializes in serving as a General Contractor for a
diverse range of construction projects, including new ground-up construction, demolition, and
interior and exterior renovation. With a dependable in-house team and dedicated project
management teams, they oversee all aspects of the construction process, from abatement to hazmat
safety work. Their expertise extends to managing Design-Build projects, coordinating with
architecture and engineering teams to deliver cost-effective, value-engineered solutions.
Additionally, The Contractor self-performs various construction trade work such as roofing,
waterproofing, and site demolition.
The Contractor has successfully completed over $150 million worth of projects for various DC
Government properties since 2010. The contractor has been determined responsible in accordance
with 27 DCMR § 4706.1.
(G) A summary of the subcontracting plan required under section 2346 of the Small, Local, and
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Development and Assistance Act of 2005, as amended,
D.C. Official Code § 2-218.01 et seq. (“Act”), including a certification that the subcontracting
plan meets the minimum requirements of the Act and the dollar volume of the portion of the
contract to be subcontracted, expressed both in total dollars and as a percentage of the total
contract amount:
Pursuant to the Contract, competitive task order agreements will be issued for projects on an as-
needed basis. The Contractor is a Certified Business Enterprise in accordance with the Act
(Certification No. LSZXR50456092024). As appropriate, subcontracting plans will be submitted
for review and approval for each task order agreement with a value of $250,000.00 or more.
4
(H) Performance standards and the expected outcome of the proposed contract:
In general, the Contractor will provide general construction and facility maintenance projects,
including but not limited to roof repairs, life safety repairs, vandalism, windows and door
replacement, mechanical services, and other miscellaneous work as may be necessary. The
Contractor will be required to meet or exceed performance standards in accordance with the
Contract’s scope of work. DGS staff and the designated Project Manager will monitor the
Contractor’s performance to ensure consistency with the Contract’s terms and conditions, and,
more specifically, the established pricing and completion dates included in individual task order
agreements.
(I) A description of any other contracts the proposed contractor is currently seeking or holds
with the District:
The Contractor is currently holding the below project with the District:
• Johnson Middle School Roof Replacement project;
• Langley ES - Steep-Slope and Low-Slope Roof Replacement project;
• Tyler ES Partial Low-Slope Roof & Masonry Facade Replacements project;
• KIPP DC Public Charter Schools Master Service Agreement;
• BOA for OCP/DHCD;
• DOS Services Schedule Pie-qualification of General Contractors, Skilled/Unskilled Trade
Subcontractors & Related Facility Maintenance, Repair & Other Specialized Service
Contractors;
• MPD Blue Plains Impound Lot Renovation - Asphalt Striping and Compressor Parts project;
and
• DPW Fort Totten Transfer Station Roof Replacement project.
(J) The amount and date of any expenditure of funds by the District pursuant to the contract
prior to its submission to the Council for approval:
None.
(K) A certification that the proposed contract is within the appropriated budget authority for
the agency for the fiscal year and is consistent with the financial plan and budget adopted
in accordance with D.C. Official Code §§ 47-392.01 and 47-392.02:
The Office of the Chief Financial Officer has certified that the guaranteed minimum value of $50
of the proposed contract is within the appropriated budget authority for the agency and is consistent
with the financial plan and budget adopted in accordance with D.C. Official Code §§ 47-392.01
and 47-392.02. The applicable Fiscal Sufficiency certification accompanies this Council package.
5
(L) A certification that the contract is legally sufficient, including whether the proposed
contractor has any pending legal claims against the District:
The proposed Contract has been deemed legally sufficient by the Department’s Office of the
General Counsel, and the Contractor does not appear to have any currently pending legal claims
against the District.
(M) A certification that the Citywide Clean Hands database indicates that the proposed
contractor is current with its District taxes. If the Citywide Clean Hands Database indicates
that the proposed contractor is not current with its District taxes, either: (1) a certification
that the contractor has worked out and is current with a payment schedule approved by the
District; or (2) a certification that the contractor will be current with its District taxes after
the District recovers any outstanding debt as provided under D.C. Official Code § 2-
353.01(b):
The Citywide Clean Hands database indicates that the Contractor is current with its District taxes.
The relevant Clean Hands Certificate accompanies this Council Package.
(N) A certification from the proposed contractor that it is current with its federal taxes, or has
worked out and is current with a payment schedule approved by the federal government:
The Contractor has certified that it is in compliance with Federal tax laws.
(O) The status of the proposed contractor as a certified local, small, or disadvantaged business
enterprise as defined in the Small, Local, and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Development and Assistance Act of 2005, as amended; D.C. Official Code § 2-218.01 et seq.:
According to the DSLBD website, the Contractor is a Certified Local, Small, Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise. The Contractor’s Certification Number is LSZXR50456092024, with an
expiration date of September 8, 2024.
(P) Other aspects of the proposed contract that the Chief Procurement Officer considers
significant:
None.
(Q) A statement indicating whether the proposed contractor is currently debarred from
providing services or goods to the District or federal government, the dates of the debarment,
and the reasons for debarment:
The Contractor is not debarred from providing services to the Government of the District of
Columbia or the Federal Government according to the Office of Contracts and Procurement’s
Excluded Parties List and the Federal Government’s Excluded Parties List.
6
(R) Any determination and findings issues relating to the contract’s formation, including any
determination and findings made under D.C. Official Code § 2-352.05 (privatization
contracts):
The Department issued a Determination and Findings for Contractor Responsibility with respect
to proposed Contract No. DCAM-22-CS-RFQ-0016L with the Contractor, in which DGS’s
Contracting Officer concluded that the Contractor is responsible.
(S) Where the contract, and any amendments or modifications, if executed, will be made
available online:
The Contract, if approved, will be posted on the Department’s website.
(T) Where the original solicitation, and any amendments or modifications, will be made
available online:
The original solicitation and any amendments have been posted on the Department’s website.
(U) (1) A certification that the proposed contractor has been determined not to be in violation of
section 334a of the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability Establishment and
Comprehensive Ethics Reform Amendment Act of 2011, D.C. Official Code § 1-1163.34a; and
(2) A certification from the proposed contractor that it currently is not and will not be in
violation of section 334a of the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability
Establishment and Comprehensive Ethics Reform Amendment Act of 2011, D.C. Official
Code § 1-1163.34a:
Based upon a certification from the Contractor, the Contractor has been determined not to be in
violation of D.C. Official Code § 1-1163.34a; and will not be in violation of D.C. Official Code §
1-1163.34a.
7
 Government of the District of Columbia
Office of the Chief Financial Officer 1101 4th Street, SW
Office of Tax and Revenue Washington, DC 20024
Date of Notice: June 4, 2024 Notice Number: L0012031704
HRGM CORPORATION FEIN: **-***4392
1807 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE Case ID: 8035406
WASHINGTON DC 20020-6913
CERTIFICATE OF CLEAN