ENROLLED ORIGINAL
AN ACT
__________________
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________
To amend the State Education Office Establishment Act of 2000 to establish a school support
office within the Office of the State Superintendent of Education with authority to focus
academic improvement in the lowest performing schools.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this
act may be cited as the “School Improvement Amendment Act of 2023”.
Sec. 2. Section 3 of the State Education Office Establishment Act of 2000, effective
October 21, 2000 (D.C. Law 13-176; D.C Official Code § 38-2602), is amended by adding a new
subsection (d) to read as follows:
“(d)(1) OSSE shall establish a School Support Office (“Office”) to implement and
administer a school support program (“Program”) beginning in School Year 2025-2026. The
Program shall provide support and resources for continuous academic improvement to DCPS
schools and District public charter schools whose academic performance is, at minimum, in the
lowest 5% of all public schools in the District.
“(2) It shall be the goal of the Program to substantially improve academic
outcomes within 5 years of a school entering the Program. Subject to appropriations, the Office
shall provide local funding, in addition to any Formula or federal funding already available to
low performing schools, to qualifying schools that participate in the Program.
“(3) No later than September 30, 2024, OSSE shall submit a report to the Mayor
and the Council, developed in consultation with the State Board of Education, DCPS, the District
of Columbia Public Charter School Board (“PCSB”), and other stakeholders, which shall:
“(A) Compare and assess school improvement best practices from other
jurisdictions;
“(B) Identify and explain the metrics that will be used to determine the
schools whose academic performance is, at minimum, in the lowest 5% of all public schools in
the District;
“(C) Propose evidence-based strategies for continuous school
improvement models for the lowest performing 5% of District public schools, including:
1
 ENROLLED ORIGINAL
“(i) The processes and frameworks for implementing the models;
“(ii) How each strategy or model will address professional
development for educators, direct coaching, and leadership focused on addressing instructional
practice; and
“(iii) How utilization of the models and Office funding will align
with PCSB and DCPS accountability metrics and frameworks;
“(D) Provide recommendations for how the Office will work
collaboratively with qualifying schools and school stakeholders to select and implement
evidence-based strategies to significantly increase proficiency and growth in reading and math
through proven methods and improve other school designation metrics;
“(E) Provide recommendations on how the Office may strengthen a
designated school’s finances, financial management, policies, and culture;
“(F) Describe how a participating school’s improvement will be evaluated,
including the criteria for exiting the Program;
“(G) Explain how the Program will adjust to address a school that has not
demonstrated sufficient improvement to exit the program after 5 years;
“(H) Explain the funding and resources needed to successfully establish
and operate the Office and implement the Program for participating schools;
“(I) Set forth what additional authority OSSE will need, if any, to
implement the report’s recommendations and establish the Office and Program; and
“(J) Discuss any additional items relevant to the needs of the Office or
Program.
“(4) No later than September 1, 2025, and subject to appropriation, OSSE shall
apply the school improvement models developed by the school support office to participating
schools.
“(5) Starting September 30, 2026, and every 2 years thereafter, OSSE shall submit
a report to the Mayor and the Council on the improvement of schools in the Program. The report
shall address the effectiveness of the continuous school improvement models and provide
recommendations, if any, for Program improvement, including a description of evidence-based
strategies developed or further refined in the years since the last report.”.
Sec. 3. Applicability.
(a) Paragraphs (1), (2), (4), and (5) in new subsection (d) added to section 3 of the State
Education Office Establishment Act of 2000, effective October 21, 2000 (D.C. Law 13-176; D.C
Official Code § 38-2602), by section 2 shall apply upon the date of the inclusion of their fiscal
effect in an approved budget and financial plan.
2
 ENROLLED ORIGINAL
(b) The Chief Financial Officer shall certify the date of the inclusion of their fiscal effect
in an approved budget and financial plan and provide notice to the Budget Director of the
Council of the certification.
(c)(1) The Budget Director shall cause the notice of the certification to be published in
the District of Columbia Register.
(2) The date of publication of the notice of the certification shall not affect the
applicability of the provisions identified in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
Sec. 4. Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal
impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975,
approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a).
Sec. 5. Effective date.
This act shall take effect following approval of the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the
Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review
provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December
24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C Official Code § 1-206.22(c)(1)), and publication in the District of
Columbia Register.
______________________________
Chairman
Council of the District of Columbia
_________________________________
Mayor
District of Columbia
3