Bill Summary – FastDemocracy

ENROLLED ORIGINAL

                                           AN ACT

                                       _______________

                   IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

                                     _________________

To amend the Specialty Drug Copayment Limitation Act to require health insurers to apply

      discounts, financial assistance payments, product vouchers, or other reductions in out-of-

      pocket expenses made by or on behalf of a member when calculating the member’s

      coinsurance, copayment, cost-sharing responsibility, deductible, or out-of-pocket

      maximum for prescription drugs.

       BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this

act may be cited as the “Copay Accumulator Amendment Act of 2023.”

        Sec. 2. The Specialty Drug Copayment Limitation Act of 2016, effective April 7, 2017

(D.C. Law 21-248; D.C. Official Code § 48-855.01 et seq.), is amended as follows:

        (a) Section 2 (D.C. Official Code § 48-855.01) is amended as follows:

                (1) A new paragraph (3C) is added to read as follows:

                “(3C) “Generic drug” means a chemically equivalent copy of a brand-name drug

with an expired patent.”.

                (2) A new paragraph (5A) is added to read as follows:

                “(5A) “Interchangeable biological product” means a biological product that is

licensed and determined by the Food and Drug Administration to meet the standards for

interchangeability under 42 U.S.C. § 262(k)(4) or determined to be biosimilar to and

interchangeable with a reference biological product as stated in the Lists of Licensed Biological

Products with Reference Product Exclusivity and Biosimilarity or Interchangeability

Evaluations, also known as the Purple Books.”.

        (b) A new section 3b is added to read as follows:

        “Sec. 3b. Calculation of member’s contributions for a prescription drug covered under the

health benefit plan.

        “(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, when calculating a

member’s contribution to their coinsurance, copayment, cost-sharing responsibility, deductible,

or out-of-pocket maximum under the member’s health benefit plan, the health insurer shall

include any discount, financial assistance payment, product voucher, or any other out-of-pocket

                                                 1

                                                                      ENROLLED ORIGINAL

expense made by or on behalf of the member for a prescription drug covered under the member’s

health benefit plan that:

                “(1) Is without a generic drug equivalent or an interchangeable biological product

preferred under the health benefit plan’s formulary; or

                “(2) Has a generic equivalent drug or an interchangeable biological product

preferred under the health benefit plan’s formulary where the member has obtained access to the

drug through prior authorization, a step therapy protocol, or the exception or appeal process of

the health insurer or pharmacy benefits manager.

        “(b) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to a member covered by a high

deductible health plan, as that term is defined under 26 U.S.C. § 223, until the member satisfies

their minimum deductible; except, that subsection (a) of this section shall apply to contribution

amounts made for preventative care, as that term is defined under 26 U.S.C. § 223(c)(2)(C).

        “(c) This section shall apply to health benefit plans entered into, amended, extended, or

renewed on or after January 1, 2025.”.

       Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement.

       The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal

impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975,

approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a).

       Sec. 4. Effective date.

       This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the

Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of congressional review as

provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December

24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of

Columbia Register.

               ______________________________

               Chairman

               Council of the District of Columbia

_________________________________

Mayor

District of Columbia

                                                2