The proposed bill, if enacted, would amend current statutes regarding witness testimony in hearings for court-ordered treatment. Specifically, it would require that the evidence presented by the petitioner or patient includes testimony from two or more witnesses who observed or were acquainted with the patient at the time of the alleged mental disorder. This testimony would be limited to observed facts and would not include expert opinions or conclusions. The bill clarifies that these witnesses do not need to have professional licensure and can include individuals who were not formal participants in the evaluation process if they testify after the submission of the current application for evaluation.

Additionally, the bill would remove certain existing language that allows for witness testimony to be satisfied by a statement agreed upon by the parties and would streamline the requirements for the testimony of evaluating physicians or health professionals. The current law's detailed requirements regarding the nature and extent of the danger posed by the patient, as well as the need for guardianship or conservatorship, would remain intact, but the new language would focus on the limitations of witness testimony to observed facts only. Overall, the bill aims to clarify and simplify the process while ensuring that the evidence presented is relevant and factual.

Statutes affected:
Introduced Version: 36-539
Senate Engrossed Version: 36-539
Chaptered Version: 36-539